Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2859)	2/4/1998 9:31:00 AM
From: Susan Saline	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4571

BW 02/04 09:28 Brush Creek Locates Further Gold Occurrences in Attempt to Define Parallel Ore Shoot BW 02/04 09:17 Brush Creek Locates Further Gold Occurrences in Attempt to Define Parallel Ore Shoot; Assay Results from Pillar

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2859)	2/4/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Jeffery E. Forrest	Respond to of 4571

Thanks for the confirmation Gary. I was pleasantly surprised when I did my charts last night. It really does look stronger than ever at this point and that is saying something in light of the chart we had a few months ago which was wildly bullish. I agree with what you had to say inre the CCI. Nice upturn. Lot's of congestion from here to 1.06 which could make it slow going for at least a few more sessions, but when we finally break thru that level it should be a quick pop to 1.20-1.25ish. Bottom line- I LOVE the looks of this chart. Good to hear from you again. _______________________________________________________________ I wish SI hadn't changed the message feature. You can't reference the post you're answering anymore unless you hit the Back button. Cumbersome. I'll have to drop a line to Brad & Jeff.

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2859)	2/5/1998 1:37:00 AM
From: Lawrence Burg	Respond to of 4571

You & Jeffrey better start packin' your bags (guess I should've spelled that baggs... ;-) Just kidding. Although Eric seems to be absent from SI lately, I assume Jeffrey answered his & Whipsaws questions. TA looks like it's getting primed in our favor. I can't see how recent announcements would hurt the TA either. Thanks for your collective efforts. The only minor thing I have to add comes from Lionel a few days ago regarding PRs. He mentioned that PRs are reviewed by NAS (not sure anymore if SEC or NASDAQ) prior to release. This in an effort to gauge their market impact and verify veracity. Falls in line w/Tom K's comments over on Trooper. PS, off topic, check some comments over on omreht.

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2859)	2/13/1998 3:22:00 AM
From: Lawrence Burg	Respond to of 4571

...For Eric & Jeffrey too...while I'm learning...and trying to fathom the obvious discrepancy of your reads on AD... I thought that ADI's (OBV, Williams) might be tied to the fixed available volume (float); which would imply an ignorance of new shares coming on board. This doesn't appear to be the case. Most definitions I find involve only the traded volume, irrespective of float. Thus, it seems, a drawback in the independent indicator. I thought that despite your indication that PP shares were being closely held, action to the contrary might affect the math of ADIs; and thus the divergence of opinion. Since the indicator is simple like this I'm still perplexed as to how you guys are reading so differently. Unfortunately, Eric's read seem to be right, or the influence of ADIs on BCMD TA needs to be severely reduced. And questions...what, if any, indicator can record the influence of pp dilution? I'd guess none, since by the time you become aware of an increase in the float, the price has already reacted. What theories are there on badly behaving ADIs? How do you guys explain your opposite reads? (Not meant as a cut, just trying to "get it").