Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pocotrader who wrote (1305240)	6/23/2021 3:20:07 AM
From: Winfastorlose	2 Recommendations Recommended By Mick Mørmøny miraje Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578564

All of the "pro vaxxers" on an experimental gene therapy treatment that has NOT been tested for long term safety are insane in my opinion when it is becoming obvious that there are effective alternative treatments available that do not carry the inordinate risk the so called "vaccines" do. The only way the mRNA gene therapy treatments received their EUAs was by claiming HCQ and Ivermectin were dangerous and did not work. EUAs can only be granted if there are no alternative treatments available. New studies have now been completed which have completely debunked the claims of lack of efficacy and safety of HCQ and Ivermectin. They are not only safe as backed by decades of use, but they are very effective in helping to prevent Covid19 deaths. The FDA advised last week that no more new EUAs would be granted for Covid 19 and that in the future the safety tests must be completed and standard testing protocols must be followed.