SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Julius Wong who wrote (173615)6/24/2021 9:02:45 AM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations

Recommended By
maceng2
marcher

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217552
 
I am guessing that the authorities would not want to panic-strike us plebs should they know for sure that we shall be cratered by an asteroid impact.

Given so, am suspicious that the same authorities would not want to panic us should they merely suspect that an asteroid might impact us and more likely cross our path and be on its merry way.

If so, why should the authorities tell us anything they suspect might be true, with regard to anything that might trouble us, and particularly having to do w/ imponderables such as virus floating about, vagaries to do w/ evolution, and uncertainties to do w/ never properly tested vaccines - you know, the sort of happenings they can do little to nothing about, especially if they know we would not believe them.

GroundHogDay 2020 replayed 2021, ‘22, ‘23, ‘24, and 2025. Baked in?



To: Julius Wong who wrote (173615)6/24/2021 1:43:47 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217552
 
Way back I took heat saying mask was better than distancing ... distancing was a ploy to cover up government ineptitude,... even droplets can travel far more than the magical 6ft... let alone true aerosol.. So even worse than I suspected... of course anti maskers say aerosols not stopped by masks ... :( which largely I do not buy...