Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (173714)	6/27/2021 2:57:19 PM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Recommended By maceng2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218431

Stagflation looks to be the most likely scenareo barring a full blown crash, which if it ocurred, would blast past any gains since 2008 imho, and maybe way beyond that too imho. I think that's right... Just have to remember, it isn't about money, for them... which isn't a motivator for people who can print as much as they want ? A crash... not a random event, but coordinated... is just a means of reinforcing the corrupting influence of monetary self interest... relying on all who are participants in the financial system to be willing to go along with "what is made necessary to save their money"... That event thus being a tap on the shoulder to inform you... "don't threaten our power"... as they seek to grow their power beyond the limits we've intentionally imposed on them... The event in 2008... was the watershed... when we should have made the banks fail... rather than empower them to corrupt everything else... the way they had the mortgage markets... The power seeking behavior... doesn't care about the money... which means they will gladly burn the whole thing down to the waterline if that is the only means they have to sustain power and control ? If a March 2020 event... or a virus and a lock-down... forced behavioral modification to impose compliance... doesn't solve economic problems... well... that wasn't its purpose ? For them, it is NOT about optimizing economic performance, any more, once they've slipped the bonds that constrain them to that function... but all and only about preventing THEMSELVES from failing... even if that means needing to force everything else to fail... So, if "worse than 1929" is what they think will scare you into compliance.... expect they will do that ? The way you prevent it... is by ensuring they know... if that happens... they're done. The Fed... was supposed to "end the business cycle"... but instead they control it to use it as a weapon...