Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (173783)	6/27/2021 9:14:35 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 217647

I think at the moment the bosses are aiming for a full investigation, being planet-wide which should be welcomed but meeting resistance, and so resisting same is what the readings between the lines on this side seem to indicate thus the vectors seem to be coming together am enthusiastic for the truth

To: carranza2 who wrote (173783)	6/27/2021 11:32:57 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217647

I have a couple of quibbles with the article... none of which are technical... all of which are about the sequences in "blame"... and errors and omissions.. Yes, first, is that China is most responsible... They failed to protect their own people, and then converted that failure into biological warfare in an attack on the rest of the world. And that matters far more, now, than sustaining the "debate" about the origins of the virus. Given what is known now... that is true of the failures before and particularly after the fact of the virus infecting people in Wuhan... China's continuing suppression of information is criminal... and their choices resulting in deliberately enabling the spread of the virus... a clear crime against humanity. But, from there ? It is not clear to me that we know enough, yet, about the activities in the other labs... or the nature of the interactions between the labs and China's military... or the nature of the interaction between China and others with a clear parallel interest in that sort of work... such as the Gates Foundation and others... including the Agenda 21 crowd and other NAZI's... and that conversation is not happening, still ? So, the caveat the article applies... after blaming Shi... in noting they don't know what other labs were doing, so mostly blame her... ? They should have put the caveat first... which would also draw attention to the need to answer that wide open question, first, before proceeding to assign that blame as they did. So, 1. China, 2. the lab, 3. the researcher... gets that aspect more right... but, "the lab" is not just the physical facility... but includes all of the extended support network... But, their #3 as "the global community of virologists" ? Ridiculous... particularly in relation to their #4... clearly being downplayed... as much as it can be... by the dismissive ranking... And, then, to put the U.S. as #4 along with the Canadian issues... as last... ? Both Canada and the U.S. bear clear responsibility for enabling the Chinese in doing the work they were. That FAILURE in responsibility is not limited just in relation to the fact that the virus DID escape, though ? They're clearly guilty of subverting our national security... and global health security... by wrongly enabling the Chinese in doing the work they were... which is a problem that is clearly not limited to the one instance. What else aren't they saying ? So, that is clearly NOT a #4 issue... but a #2 issue... as the funding makes them JUST AS responsible as the lab... re the focus on the article on "responsibility for enabling the escape from the lab"... The article notes the U.S. not more forthcoming than China is in broadcasting this news... but fails in noting that one reason would be... the one funding the work... owns a big pile of the legal liability for the result. The nature and limits of the cooperation... also seems it is something they want to ensure is ignored ? The #1 issue for most Americans, though... few of whom would have been comfortable enabling that cooperation...is BOTH that 1. no one should have been doing that work... and that 2. given the obvious military applications... no Chinese work should have been getting that type of help, in labs here, or there... while also, 3. the effort doing it... clearly violated the law... as well as reason and common sense. Fauci, et al ? I'm torn between not knowing if the bigger problem being exposed is their involvement in enabling 1. "crimes against humanity" or simply 2. "treason"... but, also, the fact of those was only made possible when 3. violating the laws clearly prohibiting funding of the specific type of work he funded... But, not a limit there, still... as there are other issues in omissions ? The WHO gets a pass.... ? And, the media are dismissed as bystanders... who could have done a better job of standing by... ? Both are obviously wrong. At least it seems with some truths being spoken... getting closer... to enabling a global health revolution ?