Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (747923)	6/29/2021 9:41:38 AM
From: Sdgla	7 Recommendations Recommended By Alan Smithee alanrs isopatch lightshipsailor Old_Sparky and 2 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793900

Proven true ? Even then what’s the penalty ? Sharyl Attkisson was electronically raped by 0bamas DOJ and nothing was done to the perps.

To: LindyBill who wrote (747923)	6/29/2021 1:07:42 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 793900

>> If Tucker’s claim that the whistleblower has information that could only have been obtained by spying on him and his staff is correct, it could turn into a scandal. NSA's motto is "Collect it All". It would be naive to think they're not "collecting it" from Tucker and other news reporters; it is, after all, self-protection for NSA to know what's coming down the line from news agencies. One has to think that telcos and OEMs are forking most of it over unencrypted, just as they were doing 15 and 20 years ago. But with vector processors that can perform 150 trillion operations a second on a chip each, piled sky high in Utah, one gets the idea that run-of-the-mill encryption is no longer a barrier. In an era of 15 terabyte disk drives warehoused by the thousands, you not only collect it all but you can keep it all. Why wouldn't Tucker's phone calls and text messages be readily available to NSA?