Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sunabeach who wrote (29339)	6/29/2021 2:17:38 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 96749

I am not saying that -- but suppose that the ratio were 1:10 or 1:100 -- would that be acceptable with a recovery rate of more than 95% for people < 60 for covid?? This is nothing but nutz -- is this young woman and the others who have died -- an acceptable price to pay? youtu.be wake up. this is eugenics. this technology was planned well in advance of the pandemic. You wait and see how many women are unable to carry pregnancies to term -- if you think I am a kook. Give it 18 - 24 months. There are 6-8k dead from this vaccine that may have had no problem with the virus. Here is the big thing that no one says: There may in fact be a very large proportion of the population that is naturally immune to covid and yet -- the constant drumbeat is everyone must be vaccinated. Think for yourself and ask yourself WHY ... f' the people that foisted this experiment on people -- especially young people at virtually NO risk from covid. They are one with Joseph Mengele, in my opinion.