Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (29418)	6/29/2021 9:30:29 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Respond to of 96840

The biggest proof is the drop in deaths once the vaccination got on the way. worldometers.info But it's still worth digging into this given that it was not tested as extensively as it would have been in normal times. I wonder how many of those deaths are people with high BP or heart problems. I guess that is not tracked.

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (29418)	6/29/2021 9:43:47 PM
From: jpdunwell	1 Recommendation Recommended By ajtj99 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 96840

1) I gave you a link to the VAERS data on the CDC site. Please feel free to check the source and the numbers there. What more do you need? 2) The flu vaccine is given every year to the elderly, and although I haven't researched this, I would be is probably the most prevalent vaccine given annually up until now. That's off the cuff, so I stand ready to be corrected. 3) To use your own argument-No links for your claims or numbers, so I cannot check the source. Although as I'm sure you're well aware, these statistics are highly debatable in any case. I believe by the CDC's own estimation, the fatality rate for COVID was 0.6%, and that was in the relatively early going. We have learned a lot about treatment since then, and if honest discussions weren't being suppressed, I think we'd learn a lot more. I hardly think those numbers justify the type of vaccination campaign that we've seen, having this pushed even on young people who risks arguably may be higher from the vaccine itself. You obviously haven't taken time to try to understand my point of view, and want to try to force yours on me, even though I haven't done the same. I happen to think there are better, less risk-averse treatments available, and you're not going to force your agenda on me. Feel free to tell me what "disinformation" I've spread.