To: marcher who wrote (174004 ) 6/30/2021 10:40:45 PM From: TobagoJack Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218660 Re <<there is a 'plan' >> Sounds like a reasonable hit list. Thank you very much for the detailing. Outstanding especially if they were top of mind. China did and continues to do same Perhaps three differences in detailing / execution unless I missed something in the USA programming, that in China ...(1) scientific trial & error, feedback and correction: the multi-decades program was first trialed by selected municipalities picked out by evaluation of their plans, and the experiences are aggregated by discussion amongst all municipalities(2) plug the leaks of efficacy: the corruption (tigers and flies scmp.com ...Communist Party jargon: from tigers and flies to the Chinese dream, 10 slogans used in the Xi Jinping era ... was rooted out through protocol unique to the CCP and the dynasties of old, that which actually work and without technicalities getting in the way (IOW Cosby and OJ would have rotted in jail), involving each layer starting at the lowest layer has an opportunity, one opportunity, to self-confess / whistle-blow on their same-level and upper level folks re anything they know that might reasonably be construed as wrong, and on up goes the layers called in to whistle-blow and to self-confess, one chance only for leniency the system tends to work well, for opportunity for self-salvation should never be belittled per prisoners dilemma theory(3) put in place the carrots: success in the course of implementation ensures votes (yes, within the CCP they vote) for promotions, all the way up, per merit I do not believe the China system is for most other if any other domains, and so NOTHING to export, except benchmarks to consider other protocols scmp.com Could China’s model of growth be its biggest export to the world? Beijing’s combination of authoritarianism, capitalism and infrastructure has proved appealing to some countries weary of Western neoliberalism But that approach is a product of its past and could struggle to gain a real foothold elsewhere, observers say Given above as benchmark we can watch the American infrastructure spend. It might work if the weight of money can breach the lack of trial & error, the corruption leakage, and the electorates can tolerate tax borrow and spend within context of probable errors and likely leaks. Societal trial shall happen for one roll of the dice, to 2024, and then wait & see, to 2028, etc etc etc, a sort of trial & error & feedback built-in to the system already, just requiring vastly more sums.