SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (174191)7/3/2021 11:26:42 PM
From: sense1 Recommendation

Recommended By
gg cox

  Respond to of 219662
 
Yeah.

I'm a biologist...

Deciding to identify as a tree frog... doesn't make you a tree frog... and neither does tree frog reassignment surgery. Or, pick any other thing you are not... a Morgan Roadster... and you're not that, either, because you "choose" to be... as choice has rational limits, and because what you are in that real sense, isn't a choice you can make. You can choose to be an athlete... but you can't choose what genetics you're born with... which will remain true until we have perfected time travel...

Purely in a biological sense... you can't "choose" to alter the historical fact your muscles grew up with a testosterone kicker... as that remains a reality whether idiots on the political left think it "should" or not. And, in the degree that you "could" change that fact... most men who are now "winning" in women's sports would instantly become losers in the result... in more than in the social sense in which that seems true to most people, now.

But, you can TEST people... to determine whether their muscles are more male or female... and have them compete in the right category... based on what their biology requires instead of what they prefer.

And, right now, those "women" who are men... have muscles that are far more male than female... and should not be allowed to compete as something they are not...




To: TobagoJack who wrote (174191)7/4/2021 4:52:03 AM
From: roto  Respond to of 219662
 
this makes more sense.. Adam in a whole lot prettier!!