Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (204564)	7/8/2021 3:04:04 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 362954

>> As I have said before, those funds would be needed to support teachers who ARE ACCUSED OF violating the law. >> only that gathering funds for legal defense does not demonstrate that anyone intends to flout the law, as you have apparently and illogically concluded. That statement could not be interpreted as anything other than encouragement to violate the law. There simply isn't any other way to see it. The act of saying it is essentially to say, "Even though the people, through their chosen legislative representation, may have stated 'Teachers MAY NOT do THIS', we are making money available for your defense if you choose to break that law." I have drawn no conclusions as to what a given teacher might or might not do. Only that the unions are fomenting illegal acts. Which, of course, is precisely what unions do. (I was raised in a locality where spiking trees and setting forest fires was not unusual during a strike, so I'm familiar with the MO).