Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (174680)	7/12/2021 5:39:09 PM
From: marcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219497

those changes concern me, too.

To: gg cox who wrote (174680)	7/12/2021 6:12:40 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219497

You are mis-reading your computer screen... Must be because of the great distance between you and it ... as you isolate from modern technology ? I am barefooted whenever that's feasible... as I have been most of my life. Back in the day... grew up in central Florida... they didn't even require you to wear shoes to school... and I rarely did... save on those bitter days in winter when the temperatures plunged into the mid 60's. In Florida, the stores all have signs... "No Shirt. No Shoes. No Service"... because lots and lots of people wear no shirt or shoes when the sun is shining... But, that's got nothing much to do with properly observing "what is" in relation to the changes occurring on the planet... As I was an observer present at the time when the goals and the plan for how to market global warming were created... I again occupy a different place on the line between reductionism and holism than you might... No doubt that works as a filter that conditions some of my observations, but, I'd say, only in the sense of preventing me following "random" rabbits down too perfectly placed holes... If you are present at the planning for how to shatter the cookie jar... that fact might not alter how Mom evaluates the sincerity of plaintive pleas that "it was an accident"... but, you can't be convinced it was. However... that awareness one does have... that another lacks... is hardly a valid proof of the aware one's lack of concern... either in the fate in distribution of the formerly contained cookies... or anything else ? That LEAP made though... from assumptions made based on a limited perspective... to accuse another of being blind... while assuming the difference must be driven by "bad faith" ? Shameful. Why the desperation to be... "correct"... and claim you are... when it is you who don't know ? The sibling who was not in the room when the plan was hatched... and who was not in the room when the cookie jar hit the floor... has an opinion about guilt and the proper fate of the cookies ? Hmmm. Not the first time in the last few days... that I've pointed out that EXACT element... of the blind (who are blind... or have selective vision... a limited perspective, obstructed view, etc. ) seeking to silence those they accuse of being blind (who can see perfectly well... from a spot with a full view) ? Applies to the Dr. talking about the issues with blood cells... and those seeking to silence him ? But, I noted that directly, too in another post here... ? Forget which.... but did ask, "what drives that behavior" ? Apply it to the Doc... and you HAVE TO WONDER... as the most important aspect in your observations of the situation... what drives the desperation in the opposition... who clearly DEPEND on you (us, or not enough of us) NOT hearing and learning from what the Doctor is saying ? Should I be more concerned about the virus... or more concerned about the meaning of the desperation on the part of those seeking to prevent others from learning obvious truths... that ARE backed by science... while they pedal lies ? And, perhaps... it might be useful to generalize that recognition of a problem... as "you are being lied to"... to find out why you are being lied to... as a part of determining more than one truth... ? You KNOW the media are being censored... but still think the messages they're pushing... must be legitimate... since they CAN'T stand up to a simple examination by those who know ? Hmmm. Maybe "global warming"... isn't as critical a subject as... the means employed in lying to you about it ? But, only after disposing of that... by not allowing it to be ignored... would it become useful to discuss REAL observations that might be of interest... in relation to realities... both naturally occurring and those accidentally or deliberately imposed by humans.... Note the common thread in preventing such events... will tend to boil down to the SAME approach I noted in the bit on gender... where the "scientists" suddenly declare the science has to take a backseat to things deemed more important (than the truth of the situation) when making decisions about "what should be" ? The corrupt logic... is EASY to identify... And EVERY TIME you see it... you should be aware that frauds are practiced for a purpose... which only rarely is directly connected to thing that is being lied about... and only that ? You can''t study God using science... but, you sure can study PEOPLE using the tools science has... and apply a bit of logic to the efforts you see made in trying to lie to you, and manipulate you ? "No questions allowed"... ? Why ?