Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ajtj99 who wrote (30325)	7/12/2021 8:42:06 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97495

Ok, I repent. <g> I liked the BBC prior to 2020. There was a fellow there, who for not being balanced, at least wasn't a jerk. He actually interviewed people. Not any more. I had to leave BBC behind after the case-demic and lies of the supposed insurrection. I listened to them before in spite of the climate BS. Was better than US news. I'm sure they still have some good reporting.

To: ajtj99 who wrote (30325)	7/13/2021 11:21:43 AM
From: roto	1 Recommendation Recommended By ajtj99 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97495

I have on- line what you have BBC & SCMP.. in addition a host of others AXIOS, THE WEEK, THE HILL, POLITICAL for my poly takes & a few more. BBC on- line is excellent. SCMP has a few "caucasian" apologists (+ I see that Jackie Chan wants to be a commie now).. is still doable but the push for subscribership might stop that. I'm thinking Jack Ma needs a few bucks to pay for his membership in the 'club'. My impression is the on- line political takes are fairly neutral, although I thoroughly disagree with the current 'political' definition of sedition. There should be teeth in the law. I think the government's approach is much too nice.