Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (174761)	7/13/2021 1:37:46 PM
From: maceng2	2 Recommendations Recommended By ggersh isopatch Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217591

If any of those guys were interested in peoples health, they would have lifted the widespread and ridiculous censorship, and had HCQ and Ivermectin (plus many others) given a decent trial and debate in public. The fact is this was not done, and this has clear indications what is going on. Only vaccinations are allowed to be considered and all news on alternates is supressed. It's very obvious indeed, no doubt about it in my mind. We now know the reason for this, it's because the "Emergency Use" would be lifted if an alternative treatment was allowed. Many people have suffered, and suffered a painful death, because of this malpractise. Senior medical practitioners have voiced clear concerns on this matter. Anna Brees on Twitter: "I am glad I contacted Dr Roger Hodkinson and Dr Mike Yeadon re: ivermectin, it needs to be debated... t.co; / Twitter And no, the media do not know better, and neither do the "fact checkers" .