SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sense who wrote (174864)7/15/2021 12:50:03 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217792
 
Re << Not sneaking up on anyone now, the way it did back in 2020... >>

Yes, but …

No one seems to care, all waiting, seemingly, for the bell to toll first for the other fellows / fellowettes, the ‘them’.

On my shore folks are slightly more cautious (or chicksh*t) for lack of universal basic income, no free-pass on robbery of below $1,000, and no loans for any college degree useful or not.

And certainly no housing debt secured by nothing except home equity. All loans secured by everything one has, in savings, and future earnings.

Just saw a friend through divorce process accompanied by bankruptcy procedure, and ouch!

The process saw the couple stripped of everything except their government issued home, and henceforth the government is their partner in perpetuity in the home equity, and the call is with the government.

bloomberg.com

Americans’ Debt Soars to $14.64 Trillion in Borrowing Binge

Americans are officially borrowing more than they ever have.

Consumer debt soared to $14.64 trillion in the first three months of the year — even as credit card balances notched their second biggest decline on record. That’s because Americans are still sitting on an-ever increasing mountain of student loans and ultra-low interest rates spurred the housing market to new heights.

The amount of outstanding auto loans also reached a record as consumers shied away from public transit and clamored to purchase personal vehicles, despite soaring used car prices.

Even though consumer spending has largely returned to pre-Covid-19 pandemic levels, Americans have reverted to using debit cards more often to travel or dine out. They’re chipping away at checking-account balances buoyed by stimulus money sent out to get the U.S. economy through the pandemic. That behavior has puzzled both bank executives and economists.

Why It MattersConsumer spending activity accounts for nearly three-fourths of gross domestic product in the U.S. — so economists are betting on the health of Americans’ finances to lead the economic recovery from here.

For banks, the way Americans spend and borrow matters because they’ve built entire businesses around their immensely profitable credit card offerings and those businesses rely on consumers borrowing for some portion of their revenues. If the pandemic sparks a permanent sea change in the way consumers finance their purchases, it will have real ramifications for the way banks operate.

Delinquencies across all major categories of household debt have dropped precipitously, as people take advantage of repayment moratoriums and keep up with their bills.

“We feel that the consumer is just leaning forward and doing what they can to break out from this sort of lost year that they have had,” Capital One Financial Corp. Chief Executive Officer Richard Fairbank said during an investor conference in June.

Sent from my iPhone



To: sense who wrote (174864)7/15/2021 4:28:52 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217792
 
bearish

Jay Powell is shy about being tee-ed up as geopolitical weapon, alongside CoVid this, vaccine that, TikTok (oops, TikTok off of the hook for now) something not Huawei, etc etc

if so, money is refusing to engage in the cataclysmic struggle of the century per Biden in the China / USA drama, and at least by the FED, money is not geopolitical ammunition, and savings are not grenades. Negative for gold?




To: sense who wrote (174864)7/15/2021 11:13:41 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217792
 
Slow news day on the CoVid front. Noting note to avoid getting sick enough to end up in hospital, even as I note the news is pitched w/ vaccine in mind, even if flawed vaccine that doesn’t seem to work or is failing. Who knows? ‘They’ don’t. They do not know whether the vaccine itself does damage on cumulative basis on any organ until the subject is eventually opened up. ‘They’ cannot know, because cumulative means several shots to many jabs.

bloomberg.com

Half of Covid Hospital Patients Develop Complication, Study Says
Naomi Kresge
July 16, 2021, 6:30 AM GMT+8

One in two people hospitalized with Covid-19 develop another health complication, a U.K. study showed, in the broadest look yet at what happens to those sick enough to need inpatient treatment.

Though complications were most common in those over the age of 50, the study found a significant risk for younger people as well. Among 19- to 29-year-olds hospitalized with Covid, 27% experienced a further injury or attack in an organ system in the body, while 37% of 30- to 39-year-olds experienced a similar complication, the researchers said in The Lancet on Thursday.

The study followed 73,197 patients admitted to U.K. hospitals between January and August of 2020 -- meaning it didn’t capture the impact of vaccines or improved treatments, or that of the virus variants that have spread around the world this year. The best way to stop complications is to keep people from getting sick enough to need hospitalization in the first place, the research team said at a press conference.

“The best way of preventing this is vaccination,” said Calum Semple, a professor of child health and outbreak medicine at the University of Liverpool and the study’s chief investigator.

Kidney injuries affected almost one-quarter of all the hospitalized people, the researchers said, and liver and intestine problems were particularly common in younger patients. The study focused on hospital complications, acute attacks that occurred during initial treatment, not on the symptoms of long Covid.

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Sent from my iPad



To: sense who wrote (174864)7/17/2021 6:32:44 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217792
 
RE <<I do note the parallel in the patterns on the upward sloping charts>>

Am noticing stiff as well, that may be hinting that all is not well, and might get very much worse, but if so, then not-priced-in

correlation is not necessarily cause / effect, I get that, but at the same time correlation is correlation

of course does not speak to seriousness, etc etc, but that stuff lags, just like inflation and gold, or gold and inflation, hard to say which leads what at any given way-point

zerohedge.com

"This Is Worrying Me Quite A Bit": mRNA Vaccine Inventor Shares Viral Thread Showing COVID Surge In Most-Vaxxed Countries



To: sense who wrote (174864)7/19/2021 4:59:22 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217792
 
it is all so mysterious, the wonderfulness of gold, taking into account the macro as time flows

US$ up, gold down

On that basis, in a crisis, gold can go down a lot when moment of truth happens, when all mysteriously run towards the $

I get it, I think, or may be just following the herd.

In any case, re inflation, turning out that China is a conduit rather than a source of inflation (not exactly the way I would characterise it, for it must be difficult to sort out which is what when), according to WSJ, and if so inflation must really zoom should China stop conducting and start sourcing

MSM is so fixated on the why of inflation rather than on the reality of inflation

Gold down.

how-china-is-helping-to-damp-global-inflation-11626616802

How China Is Helping to Damp Global InflationEconomists see China as a conduit rather than a source of inflationary pressure in the post-pandemic era

By
July 18, 2021 10:00 am ET



Many Chinese factories are absorbing higher costs for raw materials, helping prevent consumer-goods prices elsewhere from rising even further.Photo: gabriel crossley/Reuters

Yawning GapAn index of China's factory-gate prices hassurged this year amid higher commodityprices, while consumer inflation stays muted.



China’s own economy is far from overheating. So it isn’t really a main driver of the demand that is pushing up prices of commodities and consumer goods world-wide, economists say.

And while some Chinese factories have passed on price increases to Western buyers this year, many are also absorbing higher costs for raw materials like copper and iron ore themselves.

That has helped prevent consumer-goods prices from rising even higher elsewhere, though it has also meant lower profits for some Chinese factory owners.

“The experience from the pandemic suggests that China is still an important part in preventing global prices from going much higher,” said Hui Shan, chief China economist at Goldman Sachs.

China’s role in driving global prices has always been complex. Its emergence in recent decades as the world’s factory floor brought millions of low-cost workers into the labor pool and helped make consumer products like jeans and sofas cheaper for everyone.

But there have also been periods when China’s growth wound up exporting inflation to other countries, mainly through higher commodity prices.

In the early 2000s, Chinese energy demand sent oil prices higher. After the 2008 global financial crisis, Beijing unleashed hundreds of billions of dollars in stimulus to build bridges and apartments, boosting metals prices.

During the pandemic, however, Chinese leaders refrained from excessive infrastructure spending because they wanted to avoid adding more debt and risking asset bubbles in areas such as housing.

Chinese authorities put the brakes on new bank loans being channeled into the property sector and moved to curb speculation in commodities, curtailing somewhat the country’s appetite for metals.

“The role China plays as an [end] consumer of commodities has been much smaller this time around,” said Michelle Lam, Greater China economist at Société Général.

A bigger driver of inflation, Ms. Lam and other economists say, has been the gigantic fiscal stimulus spending in Western economies which helped fuel a housing boom and more appetite for consumer goods, propelling many commodity prices to multiyear highs.

While China’s producer-price index jumped to a nearly 13-year high in Maybefore edging down slightly in June, it was heavily skewed by higher import prices of oil and other commodities that China has little control over. That has caused little spillover to the country’s consumer inflation, which has stayed well below the official target of around 3% for year-end.

“China is a price taker this time, and has actually been importing inflation,” said Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie Group.

Xu Jinwei, founder of Yangjiang Hopefine Hardware Factory in the southern province of Guangdong, said prices of raw materials such as rubber rose by about 20% this year. But the firm, which makes outdoor tools and bottle openers, has raised export prices by just around 8% so far and doesn’t plan further increases, since doing so would risk losing orders.

“In our industry, competition is very cruel,” said Mr. Xu.

Factory owners’ willingness to pass on higher costs to Western buyers also is constrained by the prospect that Western demand could ebb this year as consumers shift from buying products to spending more on eating out and travel.

Steeper CurvesThe U.S.'s import prices of goods from the E.U.and Mexico have outpaced those from Chinasince the pandemic hit.Change in import prices versus a year earlierSource: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics



Economists debate how long China can help ease global inflation pressures. As China’s economy matures, its ability to keep tapping cheap workers is diminishing. Labor costs have increased steadily, and China is now wrestling with a shrinking pool of young workers willing to toil long hours in factories.

Some economists note that over time China’s latest campaign to cut greenhouse gas emissions will reduce its domestic output of metals including steel and aluminum, potentially adding to upward pressure on global prices.

Still, China is unlikely to become a big driver of inflation soon, economists say.

While import prices from China to the U.S. rose 2.7% over the 12 months that ended in May, that was less than the 5% overall increase in U.S. consumer inflation during the same period. Prices for goods shipped from Mexico and the European Union grew faster, by 4.8% and 6.5% respectively, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

If anything, economists say, global companies might want to rely on China even more if they want to keep inflation under control.

“Reshoring” or moving more supply chains out of China due to rising geopolitical tensions could lead to more inflation if the work goes to places that aren’t as cost-efficient, said Ms. Shan of Goldman Sachs. Other low-cost sources of manufactured goods like Vietnam and India are still struggling to contain the pandemic and maintain full production capacity.

“This is a really dynamic situation that’s worth watching closely,” she said.

Write to Stella Yifan Xie at stella.xie@wsj.com



To: sense who wrote (174864)7/25/2021 7:41:43 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217792
 
It is possible that ...

- inflation is transitory, if it is comprised of one-off energy recovery inflation, and includes trade-war bonus distribution

meaning inflation is simply catching up from covid depression and several decades of china china china off-shoring now interrupted or clogged or something

and once the two impetus done, inflation transited

below article does not chime with my view, but is indicative of temperature

zerohedge.com

America Has Lost The Trade War With China, And The Real Pain Has Yet To Begin

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

Corporate America sacrificed national interests in service of greed, and so did the U.S. government.

[url=][/url]

As we all know, the source of Corporate America's unprecedented explosion in profits in the 21st century is the offshoring of manufacturing to China. If you doubt this, please study the chart below of corporate profits. Apologists claim many excuses in an attempt to evade the central role of offshoring production to China, but they all ring hollow: no, it wasn't increasing productivity or automation or Federal Reserve magic, it was shipping production to China and other low-labor-cost nations.

Whether we like to admit it or not--mostly not--the American economy is entirely dependent on manufacturing in China. America's short-sighted obsession with increasing profits to fund buybacks and golden parachutes for corporate insiders and vast fortunes for financiers has led to a dangerous dependency that has handed China tremendous leverage, which China is now starting to make use of. (And why not? Wouldn't the U.S. start using the same leverage if it could?)

A long-time U.S. correspondent who prefers to remain anonymous for obvious reasons recently shared his experiences with parts shortages and price increases from previously reliable suppliers in China. Here is his account of the disruptive shift in the supply chain of essential parts from China to the U.S.

China is laying siege to the USA by slowing down production and delivery of goods. It doesn't take much to hang up US production, just one missing item can do it. So much stuff is sourced through China they can affect all supply chains. Semiconductors are just the canary--because the chains are so long and complex, and specialized materials are required, etc. But it is happening everywhere.
I have a little manufacturing company and I am seeing this in supply lines. I sent an order to China for printed circuit boards (US prices are astronomical because of various factors). They don't get back for a week, then they quote, then I send money, then they sit on it, then I call and they say they are having problems with some process... etc. But all the suppliers are like this, it is not an isolated incident. They are sandbagging.
So just as in laying siege, the attackers have the food outside the castle and wait for the people inside to starve.
As prices rise the Chinese manufacturers take bigger profits so the slowdown effects on that end are mitigated. For products they do not have a monopoly on, like PC boards, they slow down. for things like LCD displays and NFeB magnets, the items become unavailable (try buying magnets on Amazon).
I have to say this is a brilliant idea on China's part, and no one on this side has realized the situation yet. This plan is straight out of Sun-Tzu. implications? inflation and shortages will continue for a long time... maybe forever. The only long-term solution is repatriation of manufacturing to the US. But it is going to cause some serious hurt, vastly more than the sanctioning of Chinese tech companies.
i just sent a request for quote for some radio chips I use to Alibaba. they are $1 each and there are many vendors. I sent notes to 2 vendors i used before and after 4 or 5 days got a ping back that my requests were cancelled. i wound up getting the parts--for 2x the price-- from Hong Kong, which at the moment seems to be something of a channel to the mainland. But I expect they will close that leak pretty soon.


I have long made the case that manufacturing, energy and food are all fundamentally national security issues. Those benefiting from "free trade" (there is no such thing, that's just a handy PR cover) have sold the unwary the fraudulent notion that "everyone benefits" from globalization. Nothing could be further from reality. A handful of corporate insiders and financiers have benefited at the expense of everyone else.

And now the chickens are coming home to roost. Essential parts and feedstocks become unavailable for all sorts of flimsy excuses, prices double, triple, then double again, and since we've allowed our entire economy to become dependent on a handful of sources for these essentials because that dependency maximized profits, then there are no alternatives.

[url=][/url]

America has already lost the trade war, but the pain has yet to begin. Corporate America sacrificed national interests in service of greed, and so did the U.S. government. Now it's too late, and all the good seats at the banquet of consequences have already been taken.