Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mfgrep who wrote (8796)	2/4/1998 2:27:00 PM
From: Neal davidson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Jason: I think your points are well intended, but i also think you should lighten up a bit. I see that you became a member of SI fourteen days ago. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you have been a lurker for a lot longer than that. Many individuals on this thread speak to IR reps often, and merely repeat, for all our benefit, the info they have learned. Others feel they have a reliable source and, if they are not breaking any confidentiality agreements, put the info on the thread for the benefit of all. I do not feel like calling IR to get info, so i appreciate reading what others have learned. And I know for a fact that IR has told investors that numbers were expected within a certain time frame, yet they were not delivered. Thus, it is possible for a poster to state information which he reasonably feels is reliable, but which subsequently turns out to be wrong. Stocks are bought and sold on the basis of reality and the basis of perception. As a shareholder, I want to have a grasp on both. (Do you know anyone who has ever made money buying a stock based on a rumor that it was going to be taken over? I assume you see my point). Unfortunately, rumors are one of the ingredients in perception; if you have been investing for a long time, then you know that. My blood pressure is subject to rapid changes based on what I read on this thread, and I wish that the rank rumor-mongering would cease; especially the rumors leaking out of the company. But posters have the right to responsibly post their concerns, questions and info. Who else wants to make their attempt at being the thread censor??

To: mfgrep who wrote (8796)	2/4/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: Ed Huang	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Mark and Jason, Mark, thank you very much for the clarification about my post. You are the big brother here. Jason, Hey, did you rush to buy a truckload of Naxos shares today after I mentioned Buffet's name? To be more serious, I also feel sorry that I did not make my post clear enough for new comers. But if you are here longer you'll find I'm one of the guys here go against both stock hypers or naysayers who try to talk down the stock for their own benefit. I like your serious investment attitude. We are together in investing our hard-earned bucks. Best regards, Ed