Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (748753)	7/16/2021 10:00:09 AM
From: alanrs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

Without demographic information incorporated that chart doesn't tell me much.

To: Sdgla who wrote (748753)	7/16/2021 10:20:37 AM
From: skinowski	4 Recommendations Recommended By lightshipsailor Maple MAGA Neeka Sdgla Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

Numbers of “cases” - especially confirmed cases - is a function of many things - incl. size of the population and availability of testing. Deaths… everyone dies. When they try to the determine whether there was any excess mortality compared to previous years - the results are questionable. In some locations, there was a little spike - followed by a dip over following months. In other words, there was very little excess mortality caused by CoViD. That is not surprising, considering that the median age of fatalities is around 80. For the most part, they’re older than the average life expectancy. Martin Kulldorff - the Harvard prof who for his trouble got deplatformed - estimated that the odds of dying from CoViD for an old person compared to young was 1000 to 1. For the very old, several thousand to one. And the crazy fcuks still torture children with masks.