Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mang Cheng who wrote (13705)	2/4/1998 2:33:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 45548

<< OK, I meant 'collusion' - secret agreement or co-operation esp. for fraud or deceit (Oxford Dictionary). >> I wasn't trying to correct your grammar. I was suggesting that the WSJ probably didn't secretly get together with C$CO in order to deceive the public. What probably happened was the WSJ just regurgitated what it heard from C$CO. C$CO is the culprit. Pay attention to what the companies are saying, not to what the WSJ says. C$CO said they were going to grow between 30-50%. They haven't even done that over the last couple of quarters. They grew EPS at 26% for the last 2 quarters. They claim they will be number one in market share by the end of 1998 for remote access. Let's see if they can meet that forecast. They seem to be having trouble with the 30% forecast.