SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (175210)7/21/2021 10:35:32 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Cogito Ergo Sum

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217835
 
in-de-flation actually seems to be under control and would be worse had it not been under control

sino-usa, and by proxy I am guessing, same for sin--canada trade going as before trajectory

there is no trade-war detectable at the 30K feet level, seemingly

unclear what if anything was accomplished through the war effort

at this rate of attrition, the war can go on to at least 2026 if not 2032, and maybe even to 2050

maybe the tech war shall be more fruitful than the trade war

bloomberg.com

U.S.-China Goods Trade Booms as If Virus, Tariffs Never Happened

Eric Martin
22 July 2021, 09:21 GMT+8
China and the U.S. are shipping goods to each other at the briskest pace in years, making the world’s largest bilateral trade relationship look as if the protracted tariff war and pandemic never happened.

Eighteen months after the Trump administration signed the trade deal, the agreement has turned out to be a truce at best. The U.S. trade deficit hasn’t shrunk, most levies are still in place, and it hasn’t led to negotiations over other economic issues.

And yet, bilateral trade in goods is an area of stability in a relationship that has otherwise continued to deteriorate, with rising tension over Hong Kong, Taiwan, human rights, the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, accusations of computer hacking and many other flashpoints.

Surging Surplus Booming Chinese exports have overpowered imports hitting a record

Source: China's General Administration of Customs



Monthly two-way trade, which tumbled to $19 billion in February of last year amid shutdowns in Chinese factories, rebounded over the past year to new records, according to official Chinese data. And that boom looks set to continue, with China purchasing millions of tons of U.S. farm goods for this year and next and stuck-at-home U.S. consumers still shopping and importing in record amounts.

While the U.S. government’s numbers differ somewhat, the bustling trade has defied all expectations that the tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of merchandise would force a decoupling of supply chains. Instead, both sides have learned to live with the taxes, with Chinese firms buying more to fulfill the terms of the 2020 trade deal, and U.S. companies purchasing goods they can’t get elsewhere to meet elevated household demand fueled in part by trillions of dollars in government stimulus.

“We’ve seen the strong consumer demand that’s been occurring throughout the pandemic, and we’ve seen the import levels just go through the roof,” said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply-chains and customs policy at the National Retail Federation, which represents vendors from mom-and-pop stores through the big-box chain behemoths. “That’s a strong sign that the economy continues to recover.”

Exports from South Korea and Taiwan to the U.S. have also risen over the same period, underscoring the strength of U.S. demand despite one of the worst outbreaks of Covid-19 of any nation.

U.S. Demand SoarsChinese, Korean and Taiwanese exports to U.S. have boomed

Source: Official data compiled by Bloomberg



Almost half of the $259 billion in cargo moving in and out of Los Angeles port -- the U.S.’s biggest -- involves China and Hong Kong. U.S. demand for goods continues unabated, with record inbound shipments to the port in May as companies start to restock ahead of the Christmas shopping season.

“All signs point to a robust second half of the year,” Los Angeles port Executive Director Gene Seroka said during a recent press briefing, noting that fall fashion, back-to-school, Halloween and holiday goods were already arriving on the docks.

With tariffs in place on more than $300 billion in imports from China, from footwear and clothing to electronics and bicycles and even pet food, many U.S. retailers are choosing to absorb the cost and squeezing their profit margins, the NRF’s Gold said. Some are passing these along to consumers.

Firms also are dealing with backlogs and bottlenecks at U.S. ports and increased shipping costs.

“Between the cost of the tariffs and the increased cost of transportation that we’re seeing, that’s having an impact on companies’ bottom line,” Gold said. “They’ve seen significant cost increases as a result of both the trade war and the transportation crisis we’re facing.”

The U.S.-China TariffsTariffs, by percentage rate, imposed by the U.S. and China on each other since March 2018

Sources: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Bloomberg



The Biden administration hasn’t said whether it plans to continue with the deal and is reviewing U.S. policy toward China, but with U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai calling the trade relationship “unbalanced” and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen saying the deal didn’t address the fundamental problems with China, the outlook is unfavorable.

On top of those tensions, China’s purchasing targets expire at the end of the year, and the nation is well behind where it promised it would be now. Those targets were initially seen as unrealistically high and problems like the Covid-19 pandemic or the grounding of the Boeing 737 Max jet put them even further out of reach.

Read more:
How China Won Trump’s ‘Good and Easy to Win’ Trade War
China Set to Hit Pause Button on U.S. Corn Buying on Weak Market
Yellen Expresses Doubts on Results of Trump’s China Deal
Container Rates to U.S. Top $10,000 as Shipping Crunch Tightens

Even if the deal is scrapped, the lesson from the past four or so years is that even if there is political will, it’s harder to stop or divert international trade than might have been thought.

With Beijing missing its purchase targets, China refraining from aircraft purchases and companies moving automotive production out of the U.S. to avoid getting hit with tariffs from the trade war, the agreement between the world’s two biggest economies is “pretty irrelevant at this stage,” said Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, whose latest research has focused on the pact.

“China buys what China needs,” Bown said. “If it’s buying more of certain American products, it’s doing so probably out of its own interest.”

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (175210)7/21/2021 11:22:58 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217835
 
I remain ultra-bullish on Freedom HK

even as we dance whilst the music is playing

knowing that should the music stop, more consequential stuff be happening other than Hong Kong

in the meantime, gold is nice, because it has no counter-party and answers to none

bloomberg.com

Where China Rules and the U.S. Dollar Reigns

Hong Kong is the focus of antagonism between Beijing and Washington but is most of the rhetoric simply diplomatic theater?

Matthew Brooker
22 July 2021, 07:01 GMT+8

The Biden administration’s business advisory on Hong Kong has generated more heat and light than appears justified by its contents. The fireworks may be a sign that the U.S. and China are content to let hostilities play out as diplomatic theater, and are reluctant to raise confrontation to a level that would meaningfully challenge the functioning of a key global financial center.

The nine-page statement mostly reiterates facts that are known: China’s legislature unilaterally imposed a national security law on Hong Kong last year; the law has significantly reduced rights and freedoms; risks have risen for businesses and individuals, spanning areas including data privacy, transparency and access to information.

It nevertheless provoked a fierce reaction from the Hong Kong government. “The U.S. administration's latest attempt to issue a so-called ‘advisory’ to U.S. businesses and individuals operating in Hong Kong based on totally ridiculous and unfounded fear-mongering about the situation in Hong Kong only serves to prove yet again its hypocrisy and double standards, driven by ideological hegemony,” an unidentified spokesman was cited as saying in a release, employing rhetoric that has long been standard in China’s Communist state media but which was largely unknown in Hong Kong until enactment of the security law. The Chinese government called the advisory “ pure nonsense.”

The U.S. statement also drew some barely concealed irritation from the American business community in Hong Kong. Executives in the territory are dealing with these risks every day and may feel they don’t need advice from officials 13,000 kilometers (more than 8,000 miles) away in Washington that only raises the temperature and invites awkward questions from the head office. In a statement, the 1,400-member American Chamber of Commerce said it was “well aware” of an increasingly complicated geopolitical environment and its risks.

The most threatening aspect of the U.S. communique comes at the end, where the administration notes that China passed an anti-sanctions law in June, raising the prospect of countermeasures against companies that comply with U.S. penalties. The statement concludes: “Accordingly, businesses operating in Hong Kong may face heightened risk and uncertainty in connection with sanctions compliance efforts. Failure to comply with U.S. sanctions can result in civil and criminal penalties under U.S. law.”

That can be read as a warning: In the event that China extends its anti-sanctions regime to Hong Kong, the U.S. government has no intention of backing down. Companies won’t be able to use Beijing’s law as a reason for failing to comply with U.S. measures.

It’s a prospect to keep expatriate executives awake at night — being caught in a clash of wills between two giant adversaries, with no possibility of satisfying both at the same time. They can probably relax. The anti-sanctions statute is a mainland law, so doesn’t apply in Hong Kong. To make it effective in the city, Beijing would either have to insert it into the Basic Law (the former colony’s de facto constitution) as it did with the national security law, or have the local legislature pass its own laws. There’s no indication that it plans to do either.

Why not? One reason is that, by virtue of being a financial center with a pegged currency and free capital flows, Hong Kong is part of the dollar world. Hong Kong belongs to China, but the dollar system is America’s territory, across the globe. To appreciate the power of this exorbitant privilege, consider that not a single bank — U.S., Chinese or from anywhere else — seems to have been willing to offer Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam services after she was sanctioned by Washington last year for her role in implementing “Beijing’s policies of suppression of freedom and democratic processes.” Lam complained in an interview that she had “ piles of cash” at home because she didn’t have a bank account.

The U.S. holds the stronger cards in this arena, then. China, moreover, has no reason to escalate this conflict. The Communist Party has made clear that asserting control over Hong Kong is its paramount objective and it is willing to pay any price to achieve that end. But if it can do so without mortally damaging the city’s role as an international financial center, so much the better. And Beijing has already accomplished the bulk of its goals: The political opposition has been eradicated, troublesome media outlets closed down or subdued, activists arrested, universities tamed, and schools roped into a drive for “ patriotic education.”

Opinion. Data. More Data.Get the most important Bloomberg Opinion pieces in one email.

Sign up to this newsletter

In reality, this is a confrontation that the U.S. probably doesn’t want, either. Control of the world’s reserve currency gives Washington huge financial muscle, but not unlimited freedom of action. The U.S. Treasury Department hasn’t punished any Chinese bank since Congress passed the Hong Kong Autonomy Act last year, as Kurt Tong, former U.S. consul general in Hong Kong, observed in an article for Foreign Affairs this month. Sanctions on major Chinese banks could trigger instability in international transactions, in turn harming U.S. financial markets and the perceived reliability of the U.S.-centric global payments system, Tong wrote.

So it should be no surprise that U.S. attempts to punish China for its actions in Hong Kong haven’t caused any noticeable disruption to the city’s financial markets. Washington can’t fire its most powerful weapons without hurting itself. In any case, it was always likely that the loss of Hong Kong’s freedoms would lead to a slow withering away rather than any big-bang collapse. The city owes its rise as a financial center to U.S. and global engagement with China in the reform era. If that process goes into reverse, Hong Kong is almost certain to lose relevance. As ever, the city’s fate will be decided by forces that are far beyond its control.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Matthew Brooker at mbrooker1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Howard Chua-Eoan at hchuaeoan@bloomberg.net

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (175210)7/26/2021 7:03:57 AM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217835
 
In recent years I've noticed shrinkflation with canned red salmon. Several grocery chains here have dropped the traditional large 14.75 oz (418 g) size...



The alternative is either the 7.5 oz (213 g) size of the same product, or the smaller 5 oz can of the skinless/boneless product. On the plus side, I'm seeing more options for frozen salmon.