To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1309039 ) 7/22/2021 10:46:36 PM From: Broken_Clock 1 RecommendationRecommended By
Read Replies (2) | Respond to "And if he did, so what.....that's not going to give the election back to the Maggots......which is all you want..." No. I want justice. Fauci in 2012 Dual Use(Gain of function" is "worth the risk" Listen very carefully to this mad scientist. VIDEO what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? " Fauci wrote in the American Society for Microbiology in 2012, adding "Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?"the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks ," Fauci continued. "It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky. "In the paper, Dr Fauci also writes: “Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, might attempt to replicate these experiments sloppily. This is a valid concern.” ... Dr Fauci on May 11 reversed his position on whether Covid-19 had leaked from the WIV, and said he was now “not convinced” the virus had developed naturally and authorities needed to find out “exactly what happened” . Gain-of-function experiments – often with bat-derived coronaviruses – centre on manipulating, splicing and recombining viruses potentially into strands of highly infectious and little understood diseases. -The Australian
