Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Anything graphite based, CCB, Zen and hopefully much more. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (2492)	7/23/2021 8:30:52 AM
From: the Chief	2 Recommendations Recommended By Danforth thetick Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2618

Once on the property I would assume it would take us a few months to determine edges of pitwalls and do the last data collection for the water study, bundle it up and resubmit the data to CPTAQ. So assuming we start fairly shortly I see no reason why we cannot be finished with CPTAQ by Spring. In which case assuming FS is being developed in parallel, we should be ready for submission to Min of Enviro by the same time. Now, even if CPTAQ had rubber stamped us and we were beyond CPTAQ today, we would still need to do the drilling, define the pitwalls, produce the final FS which would not be ready till next spring. So, once again, I see this as a win. Next spring we would be in the exact same position with or without this caveated/conditional ruling. My observations only!