Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (175553)	7/30/2021 5:57:59 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217739

One of the reasons I liked watching "*Murder in the Bush: Cold Case Hammarskjöld" was the undercurrent that "took the piss" out of typical video documentary techniques to convince the audience of the veracity of it's argument. Wikipedia mentions this... "Parts of the movie are* meta-cinematic, reflecting upon theatrical methods used (role playing, dressing up and employment of two African secretaries) and the true motivations of the filmmaker." Cold Case Hammarskjöld - Wikipedia Quite funny in the light of the seriousness of the charges. Even the implied assassination of a United Nations secretary-general is a significant matter, but the issues get larger then that. Note the pith helmets in the photo. Helps keep the head cool when needed. If this global warming gets any worse, I might buy one -g- BBC iPlayer - Storyville - Murder in the Bush: Cold Case Hammarskjöld It's a good film to watch for anyone who likes a whodunnit story, but you have to make your mind up at the end of what's truth and what's story. There are lots of elements of truth in there, that is all I will say.