Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (175566)	7/30/2021 7:01:02 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Recommended By maceng2 Thomas M. Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 217815

WuFlu has certainly showed that Sier Dr Henry Niman way back in 2003 when discussing sars with me and others was right = a humanized version of such viruses would make for much improved transmissibility, while retaining mortality. Being scientists, of course the scientists such as Fauci et al thought it a great idea to do in the lab what nature might not get around to doing in the wild as pangolins, bats, birds, pigs and people might not create the right brew to get the job done. So it seems that the global catastrophe was in fact created by misguided scientists like Fauci No doubt they thought they were doing a good thing as they would have been thinking about vaccines that could be created. But DARPA being murderously inclined would have managed to think that such diseases would be very useful as part of military arsenals. Such viruses could be kept in a cheap little freezer and delivered by a wafting aerosol by a single individual "tourist" This has been a blunder on a grand scale. And what's worse, just as there are firemen who love fires so much that they become arsonists, I'm pretty sure some scientist would be curious, or maybe sadistically evil, and deliberately release the virus to see what would happen. It would also increase their funding, just as the Climate Alarmists have enjoyed 3 decades of fantastic funding, conferences, hotels, girls and booze at exotic locations [Cancun for example] by shroud waving and fears about CO2. Meanwhile, there's much more fun to be had by the Fauci class: = Why not get the good old H5N1 virus which is kept in cold storage in Wuhan and various USA laboratories for scientific study, and clip the covid spike onto it, combined with the Delta variant transmissibility proteins, and turn that loose? With 69% H5N1 mortality [based on previous results about 2006] and transmissibility of Delta and the covid spike, that would be vastly more successful in creating global carnage that the pathetic covid19 with its 2% mortality and those nearly all >70 years old and near their use-by date. As systems break down, it wouldn't be just infections that cause cataclysmically catasrophic calamity, but food and everything else collapse. CO2 problems would be solved in no time as human population reduced to about 10% of the present. Traffic jams would be gone. Houses would be cheap. Resources plentiful albeit unavailable. Every cloud has a silver lining. Maybe somebody should ask Fauci what he has been doing in gain of function research in H5N1. Ask DARPA whether they have got that tuned up [not that they would divulge state secrets]. If DARPA could connect H5N1 to only Russian or Made in China DNA, it would be an excellent threat, better even than the MAD atomic bombs with gigatons ready to launch. Maybe Wuhan R&D has been studying Euroserf DNA to see whether H5N1 could be preferentially connected to that variety. Mqurice

To: TobagoJack who wrote (175566)	7/30/2021 7:17:40 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217815

Interesting to see the aspirin results = 50% less mortality in those admitted to hospital who have been preloaded with aspirin. I had been thinking aspirin would be an essential ingredient to survival since a lot of death due to covid19 is apparently due to blood clotting and not just suffocation due to reduced lung function due to destroyed endothelial cells that express the nodes ready to receive the covid spike. On the other hand, bleeding is apparently a problem too and especially so with the vaccinations = Devil and deep blue sea - frying pan/fire. Take aspirin and bleed to death. Don't take it and get clotting death. I guess the greater danger is the clotting from superficial reading. So far, the best bet seems to be Be healthy BEFORE the covid19 infection Eat vitamin D3 Zinc [15 mg per day] Vit C [1 or 2 grams per day] Vit A [double the daily dose] Eat 100 mg per day aspirin Eat tablespoon of lecithin with 10 ml of cod liver oil [bonus Vitamin A and D and oils] Keep Invermectin ready to eat when infected. Eat chicken soup [feed a cold and covid, starve a fever] Hide in warm bed Stay hydrated to keep blood volume high. To develop immunity, take daily capsules of live virus [since attenuated virus is unavailable] with increasing dose from 1 virus to a trillion viruses until immunity is developed. A gradual intestinal exposure to infection will avoid the current method of inhaling a big gob of aerosol virus from somebody nearby which causes a sudden and large distributed infection throughout lungs before any immune reaction can be developed. Suffocation seems to be the main mechanism of death. Mqurice

To: TobagoJack who wrote (175566)	7/31/2021 9:56:15 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 217815

Seems pretty consistent with what I'm hearing now... although I have not yet independently validated the reports... The jab seems it greatly increases your viral load when infected, and actually increases your risks of becoming infected... Hard to say how much of that increased risk is a result of behavioral elements in the wake of wrongly convincing the vaccinated that they're "protected" from infection by being vaccinated... which they are not... and how much is a function of the vaccine itself enhancing your susceptibility. The jab was supposed to reduce the impacts of symptoms if you are infected, and perhaps it does some of that... but it also doubles your risk of mortality if you do become ill ? I'd want to see how that splits along the lines of age group, co-morbidity, etc. But, that doubling in risk of mortality still only means an increase from 0.001%... the unvaccinated risk.. to 0.002% for the vaccinated... a level of risk that is still not worth the effort made in trying to counter it... So, avoid the jab... and your risk is the same as a typical flu bug... Get the jab and that risk doubles... and may also impose other and yet unknown future risks ? But neither one of those risks is sufficient in itself to require ANY effort, beyond the routine, being made to counter or reduce the risks... There's no justification for continuing lockdowns, or mask mandates... or vaccination campaigns... There is ample justification for terminating the medical experiments now... and to begin planning for the war crimes trials of those who have been conducting medical experiments without informed consent...