Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (175813)	8/5/2021 9:40:15 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 217615

H5N1 Delta 69% dead Burn-through does not seem a sensible option. A much better option than others is to immediately hunt down any R&D and stop it, destroy all samples, ban any more "gain of function" and any infections of animals, and recombinomics MADNESS. Unfortunately, DARPA, and other military scientists Made in China, or Russia, or elsewhere might hide their efforts to develop a doomsday defence. Since Russia is surrounded by military encroachment from all directions, against which they have little defence other than asymmetric response, it would make sense for them to produce OmegaH5N1 for release into Peoria of Grand Central. Novichok, polonium 21, atomic bombs have already been demonstrated as prospective retaliatory methods to an attack in Crimea, Baltic states, Yank tanks to Murmansk, etc. I guess the Russians have quietly reminded USA warmongers about 1812 Overture, Charge of the Light Brigade, WWI and Barbarossa and explained what responses to attacks might be in the 21st century. A 69% mortality burn-through would be undesirable. Mqurice