SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ggersh who wrote (175969)8/8/2021 7:58:00 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
ggersh

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217593
 
Re <<MOA ... Message 32729442 >> ... vaping happened and happens all over the planet, but vaping death reporting seemed mostly a USA thing when it was first happening starting around late 2019 en.wikipedia.org–2020_vaping_lung_illness_outbreak even as vaping had been going on since much earlier

Strange that either vaping death didn't happen before late-2019 or was not reported, and as vaping is still happening, and vaping death is no longer happening, or once again just not reported, perhaps having been overtaken by Covid flow. Here is one of the earliest report apnews.com (2019 09 19)

It does not seem to make that much sense to intuit that 'vaping death' was an earlier and deadlier form of 'covid death' for in order to vape-death, the patient victim must be a vape-r,

unless of course the covid virus was first distributed by way of vaping paraphernalia - that would be too diabolical, along the lines of James Bond movies and surely only happens rarely when they nastily happen, ala Message 33430919

But, by all means, investigate, for where did vaping death go? because vaping assuredly did not stop and one can see the vape-rs all around downtown taking office breaks. BTW, nasty habit.

MSM seem not at all curious, which itself is curious. So many people with mind so made up. I remember in the earliest days so many people were very puzzled Message 33431860

medpagetoday.com

As COVID-19 Rages, Vaping Lung Disease Hasn't Disappeared— COVID similarities complicate EVALI diagnosis

Salynn Boyles,

In the late summer of 2019 -- months before COVID-19 was on anyone's radar -- another deadly, previously unseen respiratory illness dominated the headlines.

By mid-December, the vaping-related lung disease named EVALI by the CDC had hospitalized 2,500 people across the U.S. and killed 54 -- weeks before the first case of the novel coronavirus was reported in Wuhan, China.

By late February of 2020, as the first COVID-19-related deaths were being reported in the U.S., cases of EVALI had been reported in all 50 states, and the death toll had climbed to 68.

But by the end of March, as COVID-19 raged in New York City and the nation locked down, EVALI had largely disappeared from the news and new cases were rare in hospital emergency departments.

More than half of patients hospitalized with EVALI during the outbreak peak in the fall of 2019 were teens and young adults under age 25. Not so for COVID-19, which has hospitalized and killed mostly older adults.

But the many similarities between the two illnesses have some questioning whether they are related, and if some cases of EVALI might have actually been very early, unrecognized cases of COVID-19.

"There is no evidence of that that I am aware of, but COVID-19 has made the diagnosis of EVALI more challenging," pediatric pulmonologist Mikhail Kazachkov, MD, of NYU Langone Health in New York City, told MedPage Today.

Symptoms of EVALI closely mimic those of COVID-19. They're a mix of systemic symptoms such as fever, vomiting and chills, and respiratory symptoms, including shortness of breath and other breathing issues, cough, chest pain, and hypoxia. Radiological features of the two diseases are also similar.

"It's important to keep in mind that EVALI is a diagnosis of exclusion," said Kiran Nandalike, MD, who practices pediatric pulmonology at the UC Davis Health System in Sacramento, California. "That's why taking a careful history and having a suspicion of EVALI in teens and young adults who test negative for COVID-19 is important."

EVALI in the Era of COVID-19

Nandalike recently published a case series involving three adolescents who presented to the health system with EVALI early in 2020 showing symptoms mimicking those of COVID-19.

Chest imaging resembled COVID-19 with non-specific ground glass opacities and interstitial prominence patterns, but all three patients tested negative twice for the viral disease.

Nandalike told MedPage Today that because treatments for COVID-19 and EVALI differ, differentiating between the two conditions is clinically important. He noted that early initiation of steroids in EVALI patients has been shown to shorten the duration and severity of the disease.

EVALI cases fell dramatically following their September 2019 peak, but they did not disappear.

Investigations identified vaping products containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and the dilutant vitamin E acetate as a likely cause of the sharp spike in EVALI cases that summer, but subsequent investigation suggested that it may not be the only culprit.

"We are seeing fewer cases, but we can't really say why this is," Kazachkov told MedPage Today. "Certainly EVALI is still out there."

In a recently published commentary exploring the challenges of diagnosing EVALI in the era of COVID-19, Kazachkov and NYU Langone colleagues Melodi Pirzada, MD, proposed testing bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for vitamin E acetate in patients with suspected EVALI to confirm a diagnosis.

They noted that the recent identification of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) with COVID-19 has further complicated the diagnostic landscape.

"At least 18% of children with MIS-C present with shortness of breath and other respiratory syndromes, not unlike those of EVALI," they wrote. "The overlap of similar clinical features, use of vape products and probably SARS-CoV-2 exposure make distinguishing the differential diagnosis of EVALI from MIS-C challenging in both children and adults, particularly when MIS-C presents with respiratory symptoms."

Kazachkov said while MIS-C has been seen most often in younger children, it has also been reported in older children and adolescents. Symptoms tend to appear in the weeks after a COVID-19 diagnosis.

"Hundreds of thousands of adolescents and young adults use e-cigarettes," he said. "Distinguishing EVALI from MIS-C in those who vape could be very challenging because the two are very similar in terms of presentation and x-ray findings."

Does Vaping Increase COVID Risk?

The impact of vaping on COVID-19 has not been widely studied, but a nationally representative online survey conducted last May involving 4,351 teens and young adults suggested a strong link.

Half the respondents had a history of e-cigarette or regular cigarette use and half were never-users.

The respondents were asked about their use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes and whether they had recently experienced symptoms associated with COVID-19 or had been diagnosed with the viral disease.

Compared with never-users, ever-users of e-cigarettes were 5 times more likely to have been diagnosed with COVID-19 (95% CI 1.82 to 13.96) and dual e-cigarette and combustible cigarette ever users were 7 times more likely to have a COVID-19 diagnosis (95% CI 1.98 to 24.55). Recent (past 30 days) dual users were 6.8 times more likely to have been diagnosed than never-users.

Senior author Bonnie Halpern-Felsher, PhD, of Stanford University, told MedPage Today that the survey did not ask about COVID-19 symptom severity. The observational findings can only suggest a causal role for e-cigarette use and smoking in COVID-19.

"But we know from other studies that e-cigarettes can harm the lungs and possibly even compromise the immune system," she said. "With regard to exposure, teens who vape may be more vulnerable because they are doing so without a mask on or, possibly, sharing these products with others. It is also possible that the aerosol that results from vaping transports the virus."

Last Updated December 17, 2020



To: ggersh who wrote (175969)8/8/2021 8:26:33 PM
From: sense1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pak73

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217593
 
while the rest of the world begins to suspect "Ft Detrick...

LOL!!! Small world you live in... the crowd jammed into the back of that turnip truck. That's absolutely stupid... clearly apparent as a deflection someone pulled out of their ass... and didn't bother to clean off before applying it. Not a single element of it aligns with "what's possible"... much less the reality in "what we know did happen"...

First among those is... timing... how the story originated "on demand"... in a context... at a particular point... and then evolved... all just ridiculously bad sausage making... making Inspector Clouseau look like a rocket scientist. You could watch the "alternative narrative" being crafted on the fly... as part of a "defensive strategy" clearly being enabled by defense attorneys... who were just looking for something to throw up on the wall, hoping it might stick... and... that's what they decided to run with ? It's even bad as a farce.

As I've noted... you can't lie about what happened to the witnesses who were there at the time, or to the first arrivals at the scene of an accident... when you try to make up a different story, after the fact ? I watched that stupid story being made... and its sad that anyone is fooled by it... as its so obvious...

So, we know how "know how" got from the U.S. to China, and how "bio-materials" got from Canada to China...

We know they were working on this exact thing in the lab in Wuhan... the only point of confluence there is between all the elements required to exist... and we know some of what Gates and Fauci were doing before... and, like China, have been lying about since...

But, how did the bats from a particular cave in China... with a very particular bat virus... both of which only a very small group of researchers from Wuhan knew about or had access to... make it all the way over to Fort Detrick...? And, if it escaped from Fort Detrick and forced them to shut down their lab... why didn't it spread in New York... but DID spread in Wuhan ? China clearly hoping to succeed in transferring ownership of their own problems to others... in a way that makes no sense.

Apparently the U.S. persons and systems (and taxpayers) wrongly (and stupidly) DID support China's development of germ warfare capabilities... and we accept the evidence that Americans like Gates, Fauci, and the academic researchers did knowingly engage in that obvious treason. But, we're supposed to believe... China was also cooperating with the U.S. Army at Fort Detrick to help them create this virus... since that's the only way it could have happened ?

Ignore the fact... that the claim "it was Fort Detrick"... requires China admitting it was an engineered virus ?

But, at the same time... they continue to deny that it COULD POSSIBLY be an engineered virus... ?

It's obviously not a very well considered strategy... will only fool those who are intent on being fooled...

That flow in $, knowledge, and material that was enabled... was and is a one way flow... and everyone knows that is true...

Far more interesting... is why China would so assiduously opt to NOT try to address the problem as having its known origins in the U.S., where it clearly HAS... as in relation to those elements that we KNOW exist in proven links... the academic institutions... the Gates / Fauci links with NGO's... the Canadian lab links ?

Admit... "it was Fauci"... and China responds... "no, look over there... isn't than an elephant" ?