SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (176002)8/9/2021 12:05:51 AM
From: sense  Respond to of 217838
 
At this point, I think it is unreasonable to assume that increased vaccine coverage will result in herd immunity.


Edit, to: At this point, I think it is unreasonable to assume that increased vaccine coverage... using a "vaccine" that is known to not provide any immunity... will ever result in herd immunity.

Herd immunity... may result from the vastly accelerated spread of the virus to and by the inoculated... given they were told they were immune when they were not... But, the vaccine also appears to be accelerating the production of variants... not all of which may prove to be as inconsequential as the Delta... the next of which might well be far more capable of exploiting the modifications to immunity made in those jabbed ?


Risks of being jabbed... still growing...


It is difficult, at this point, to sort out the epidemiological aspects...


People wrongly told they are immune... stopped caring... adopted behaviors that accelerated the spread...


It appears that was perhaps the plan ? Why else would they lie to them about immunity, first... and then green-light the changes in their behavior ? The expectation perhaps being... those jabbed would quickly infect the un-inoculated... who have mostly continued to refused to cooperate... not only by not getting the jab... but also by not thinking it useful to let those who are jabbed infect them ?


So, why are the jabbed getting sick ? Is it that the vaccine makes them more susceptible, not less... or is the lack of precaution given the flagrant misinformation they've been fed... causing them to become exposed to a far more concentrated inoculum than would otherwise be expected ? Or, just the combination of all that... with a variant that isn't suppressed by whatever the hell they did in the first jab ?


Why is it... you might wonder, as I am... that there is ZERO discussion of BETTER vaccines in the pipeline ?

The goal seems it is not herd immunity... but herd amnesia ?

increased vaccine coverage probably will provide herd immunity... if the vaccine used provides immunity ?