Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (176049)	8/10/2021 3:54:51 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 217688

Haha, C2 that's quite a transition from your first post. No need for poker or 3rd order partial differential equations. Just lick your finger, stick it in the wind and see which way it's blowing. A guess is good. I thought you would be able to review my argument and present a really good case to show how I've got things wrong. I didn't really think you could make a good case as I have read quite a bit now and am developing some understanding. But I hoped for a better try than that. It's not "all the data" I expect. The data you gave was nearly nothing. And the bit of information you gave demonstrated a 30% vaccination failure so bad that it led to hospitalisation. All the data would be terabytes of information including names and addresses, blood test results for all metals and nutrient levels, ages, medical conditions.... etc etc..... The problem is that there is nearly no data. Just assurances = "Trust us, we are Settled Scientists who are really really clever and you are a dumb state serf = shut up, do as you're told, give us your money." Here is a prediction for you. I predict a high correlation of Vaxxers and Climate Alarmists. Believe in one = believe in the other. Which seems a ridiculous idea because vax/covid has nothing whatsoever to do with CO2. But I bet it's true. Mqurice