SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sense who wrote (176229)8/13/2021 4:02:33 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219713
 
Just in in-tray…

Quote

I think Malone covers only some aspects of ADE. From my research there appear to be other troubling facets. Because the mRNA vaccines are designed to create a strong antibody response (B-cells located in bone marrow) it is feared that in many people the excess of antibodies will create an excessive antibody response which results in a cytokine storm as the immune system is triggered by infection. The patient ferociously attacks and destroys the infection but dies from hypoxia due to flooding of the lungs. Another aspect is the synthetic S1 proteins produced train the immune system to zero in on just the toxic spike protein rather than the thousands of other epitopes believed to exist in the CoV genome. This applies evolutionary pressure on the virus to mutate the S1 protein in ways that evade detection and compromise the immune response. In addition,even if the spike protein doesn’t sufficiently mutate the virus can be expected to speed replication as a survival mechanism to attempt to outrun the antibody defenses. This can also result in prolonged infection and a cytokine storm.

Additional sources of factual information include Dr Robert Fleming (the flemingmethod.com),Dr Andrew Wakefield,and Dr Seneff from MIT. A deeper dive would include German virologist Dr Stefan Lanka,Dr Tom Cowan,and Dr Andrew Kaufmann. The latter group question the existence of the virus and argue it has never scientifically been isolated and proven to exist.

After countless hours of research I’ve concluded there are two possible states of the world. In a world in which no virus is responsible for illness it is reckless and stupid to be injected with a gene therapy formula that will cause the body to produce enormous amounts of toxic particles in its cells. In Malone’s world where there is a pathogenic virus causing disease a mRNA injection is a very poor solution as cited above. HCQ/Zn,Ivermectin and other therapies are available that are known to be safe and effective.


At the end of the day I concur with Dr Michael Yeadon (ex-CSO of Pfizer) who stated there are no good medical reasons to push this particular vaccine vector approach. Yeadon suspects a darker agenda must be at play. It would be difficult to argue with this conclusion after examining the available evidence.

Unquote