Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flashforward2009 who wrote (176509)	8/16/2021 5:28:06 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 217646

I don't think there's any evidence that "this thing keeps mutating into something worse"... The evidence suggests the opposite is true in the natural mutations we see occurring now... as is generally the case in the devolution of a virulent virus in subsequent iterative mutations... But, that the delta variant does not appear to be as dangerous as the alpha was... consistent with expectations... is not a guarantee that something worse won't come along... either by natural evolution OR in a repeat of the Covid round one origins... were the virus to get a bit of help, somehow... The problem is... the vaccination effort itself might well prove to be that "bit of help"... (perhaps that even being the point of an experiment ?)... which would not be impossible, but would be a lot more improbable in a normal vaccination that did confer immunity. But, as the Covid vaccine is designed and intended to NOT confer immunity, but to be a "leaky" vaccine... that converts the vaccinated into virus factories that expand the virus... allowing it free range to mutate at an accelerated pace... that improbability is escalated to good potential... And, they know that... they know the vax doesn't confer immunity... the "science" never claimed it did... but the politicians claimed it did... and they designed policy as if it did... knowing that wasn't true ? So, why did they lie to you... while using you as a petri dish to grow and mutate viruses ? It's a good question. The perception Delta is "worse"... is probably driven by people who wrongly believed they were being protected... and were wrongly told they would be able to get on with life... suddenly being faced with the realization that they were lied to... It was never true that (any of) the vaccines protected you from being infected... It was never true that the limited protections (from symptoms, only ) that the vaccines being used were capable of providing... would or could do anything to protect others... Getting to "herd immunity" by vaccination was always a lie... given the shots used did not enable immunity in one person, much less in the entire population. The policy... to lie to you... to misinform you, mislead you into participation, and then to lie again in policy created to ensure they could exploit you as a petri dish to propagate the virus and accelerate its mutation... That was not "science" doing that... ? "Science" has ALREADY provided the tools enabling us to counter the Covid.... and by the "rules" of medical ethics... that fact precludes using vaccines. As it is public polity to NOT USE those tools... but prevent them being used... in order to prosecute the agenda that requires lying to you about vaccines... ? They are not following "the rules" of medical ethics... so what they are doing is NOT MEDICINE... but something else... in the way of an experiment... that is NOT about protecting you... The protection most required.. is protection from THEM... The question is will science be able to deal with the new seemingly ever worsening variants, and will the virus stop mutating into ever worsening strains? Science will likely come through... but, when they lie to you about science... and everything else ? What will it matter if science comes through... and they prevent you from allowing that to matter... to you ? I've had both the virus and a J&J vac. I agree with what others are saying... that having had the virus obviates the utility in getting the vax... I agree with others... that the vax has risks of its own... and clearly those risks will vary depending both on which vax you got... and the luck of the draw in what happens next to pose a new risk... if anything does... I don't know what is known about the variations in risks each type represents ? But, I tend to trust doctors and researchers who take real risks to tell the truth... over those who believe they take no risks, but may take great rewards for telling lies... ? Your greatest survival skill... will be learning to tell the difference between them... knowing full well that some are very practiced liars... and some might well be very adept actors... I do think that once the truth is able to be told... the risks of participation in vax experiments that have been imposed on people... will likely be able to be addressed... The race to solve the Covid problem... and its derivatives in both new variants and vax risks... is vastly less of a problem than the race occurring between tellers of truth and tellers of lies... If the liars win... ?