SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcher who wrote (176511)8/16/2021 8:05:35 PM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations

Recommended By
ggersh
marcher

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217786
 
Back to Afghanistan, I do not understand why the crowds did not throw rocks and chairs into the sucking jet engines to stop the bug-outs

Afghanistan: We Never Learn Authored by Matt Taibbi via TK News,

[url=][/url]

Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, when asked months ago about the possibility that there might be a “significant deterioration” of the security picture in Afghanistan once the United States withdrew its forces, said, “I don’t think it’s going to be something that happens from a Friday to a Monday.”

Blinken’s Nostradamus moment was somehow one-upped by that of his boss, Joe Biden, who on July 8th had the following exchange with press:

Q: Your own intelligence community has assessed that the Afghan government will likely collapse.
BIDEN: That is not true, they did not reach that conclusion… There is going to be no circumstance where you see people lifted off the roof of an embassy… The likelihood that you’re going to see the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely.




Down to their own stunningly (perfectly?) inaccurate mis-predictions of what would take place once our military forces left the country, Biden administration officials could not have scripted a worse ending to the twenty-year disaster that has been our occupation of Afghanistan.

Every image coming out of Afghanistan this past weekend was an advertisement for the incompetence, arrogance, and double-dealing nature of American foreign policy leaders. Scenes of military dogs being evacuated while our troops fire weapons in the air to disperse humans desperate for a seat out of the country will force every theoretical future ally to think twice about partnering with us:

News that the military was forced to re-deploy troops to Afghanistan in order to ensure an “orderly and safe” withdrawal is being met with justifiable eye-rolling worldwide. It’s a little late for that:

The pattern is always the same. We go to places we’re not welcome, tell the public a confounding political problem can be solved militarily, and lie about our motives in occupying the country to boot. Then we pick a local civilian political authority to back that inevitably proves to be corrupt and repressive, increasing local antagonism toward the American presence.

In response to those increasing levels of antagonism, we then ramp up our financial, political, and military commitment to the mission, which in turn heightens the level of resistance, leading to greater losses in lives and treasure. As the cycle worsens, the government systematically accelerates the lies to the public about our level of “progress.”

Throughout, we make false assurances of security that are believed by significant numbers of local civilians, guaranteeing they will later either become refugees or targets for retribution as collaborators. Meanwhile, financial incentives for contractors, along with political disincentives to admission of failure, prolong the mission.

This all goes on for so long that the lies become institutionalized, believed not only by press contracted to deliver the propaganda (CBS’s David Martin this weekend saying with a straight face, “Everybody is surprised by the speed of this collapse” was typical), but even by the bureaucrats who concocted the deceptions in the first place.

The look of genuine shock on the face of Tony Blinken this weekend as he jousted with Jake Tapper about Biden’s comments from July should tell people around the world something important about the United States: in addition to all the other things about us that are dangerous, we lack self-knowledge.

Even deep inside the machine of American power, where everyone paying even a modicum of attention over the last twenty years should have known Kabul would fall in a heartbeat, they still believe their own legends. Which means this will happen again, and probably sooner rather than later.



To: marcher who wrote (176511)8/16/2021 8:10:37 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217786
 
Sneakers might cautiously hit the ground, to replace the harried boots that left

bloomberg.com

China Embraces High-Stakes Taliban Relationship as U.S. Exits

17 August 2021, 05:00 GMT+8
When the Taliban took over Afghanistan the first time in 1996, China refused to recognize their rule and left its embassy shut for years. This time around, Beijing has been among the first to embrace the Islamist militants next door.

China’s remarkable shift was on display little more than two weeks ago, when Foreign Minister Wang Yi welcomed a Taliban delegation to the northern port of Tianjin as the group made gains against the administration of President Ashraf Ghani, who fled the country on Sunday. Wang’s endorsement of the Taliban’s “ important role” in governing Afghanistan provided a crucial boost of legitimacy for an organization that has long been a global pariah due to its support of terrorism and the repression of women.

China’s reasons have as much to do with its own rise as a global power as the Taliban’s surprisingly swift march on the Afghan capital. China today commands an economy worth $14.7 trillion -- more than 17 times its size in 1996 -- and a massive trade-and-infrastructure initiative that stretches across the Eurasian landmass.

Beijing’s fears about Islamist extremism among its own Uyghur minority have also deepened in recent years, leading it to build a vast police state adjacent to Afghanistan. Moreover, an increasingly intense rivalry with the U.S. has prompted Chinese President Xi Jinping to seize any opportunity to push back against Washington’s dominance and push American forces away from his borders.

Those interests make China look like the next great power with a stake in bringing order to Afghanistan as the Taliban prepare to declare an Islamic emirate in Kabul. After the failures of the Soviet Union and now the U.S., China will be hard pressed to avoid repeating the same mistakes in a rugged and landlocked nation notorious for exhausting empires.

“Twenty years ago, China wasn’t a global power and what was happening in Afghanistan didn’t bother China,” said Yun Sun, director of the China Program at the Washington-based Stimson Center. “But today, there are so many new factors -- there’s the Uyghur issue, there’s economic interests and China’s self-perception as a global power.”

More on Afghanistan’s fall:
Chaotic Scenes Grip Afghan Airport, With Reports of Deaths Turmoil in Afghanistan Adds to Geopolitical Risks Facing Markets The World Awaits the Taliban’s Next Move in Afghanistan Biden’s ‘America’s Back’ Vow Torched as Taliban Overrun Kabul


China has sought to portray itself as more pragmatic and less interventionist than the West while urging a negotiated peace. “China hopes the Afghan Taliban can unite with other political parties and with all ethnic groups and build a political framework in keeping with national conditions that is broadly inclusive and will lay the foundation for enduring peace,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told reporters Monday in Beijing.

Still, Hua stopped short of endorsing the Taliban’s rule, saying only that the situation in Afghanistan had “experienced major changes.”

It was all part of a long evolution by China, which once denied any connection with the Taliban before hosting the first delegations from the group in 2013. Now, as Taliban fighters made their entrance into Kabul, posts circulated on China’s heavily censored social media comparing the event to Mao Zedong’s taking of Beijing in 1949.

Meanwhile, state media gloated over the American withdrawal, with a commentary in the official Xinhua News Agency declaring it the “death knell for declining U.S. hegemony.”

“The sound of roaring planes and the hastily retreating crowds mirrored the last twilight of the empire,” the piece said.



Afghan security forces removes a damaged police vehicle following a car bomb attack in Oct. 2020.

Photographer: Noorullah Shirzada/AFP/Getty Images

Even so, China is one of the few countries that saw some benefit from the U.S.’s $840 billion nation-building debacle, which bogged down Beijing’s rivals while creating a relatively stable environment for its companies. That’s left China with economic interests to secure, including a copper mine and several oil blocks. The country evacuated some 200 business people last month.

Afghanistan’s stability is key to protecting more than $50 billion worth of Belt-and-Road projects in neighboring Pakistan that provide a crucial overland route to and from the Indian Ocean. But perhaps no issue is as pressing for Beijing as ensuring that Afghanistan doesn’t become a source of extremism that bleeds over the Chinese border.

Wang, the Chinese foreign minister, pressed chief Taliban negotiator Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar during their July 28 meeting to make a “clean break” with the East Turkestan Islamic Movement. China blames the group for terrorist attacks it has cited to justify crackdowns in the Xinjiang region that the U.S. and others say amount to genocide.

Baradar pledged that the Taliban would never allow any force to use Afghan territory to engage in acts detrimental to China, according to the Chinese statement.



Wang Yi meets with Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, political chief of Afghanistan’s Taliban, in Tianjin, on July 28.

Photographer: Li Ran/Xinhua News Agency/Getty Images

“China’s attitude toward a Taliban-led regime will depend on its policies, for instance, whether the Taliban will honor its promises and not to become a hotbed for extreme forces that have links to China,” said Fan Hongda, a professor at the Middle East Studies Institute of Shanghai International Studies University.

Afghanistan could become the biggest test yet of a Chinese diplomatic model that’s driven by loans, commodities and infrastructure deals rather than demands for liberal policies. If the Taliban pursue moderate policies toward women that don’t alienate other nations, and achieves political stability, Beijing might consider an array of investments similar to what it has done in Pakistan, according to Sun, of the Stimson Center.

“The Chinese approach is, ‘Through economic infusion we create roads, we create infrastructure, and we make sure everyone has jobs,’” she said. “And if everyone goes to work at nine in the morning and comes home at 6 p.m., they don’t have time to think about terrorism.”

— With assistance by Iain Marlow, Jing Li, and Lucille Liu

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: marcher who wrote (176511)8/20/2021 8:52:30 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Respond to of 217786
 
Chicken soup works too