To: Riley G who wrote (659 ) 2/4/1998 11:08:00 PM From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen Respond to of 6464
Which part is a crock, Riley? That RMIL was halted? That it's not trading right now? That you've been the primary figure shouting for everyone to buy because of an anticipated short squeeze? It has a little bit to do with BAAT because you mentioned calling the certs and cornering the market. Such talk, especially since it's coming from you, is bound to cast a shadow of doubt over this company, since it's well-known you favor companies who are questionable, at best, in fundis. I, for one, am fascinated with the potential prospects of this company. Sure, I've been in and out of it about 5 times in the past two days, pocketing money on the way, but that's my newfound conservatism; pocket the money, then buy back the same number of shares on a dip. After the 10th, assuming everything goes well, I'll quit playing around for a little money here and there, and get serious about buying and keeping a more substantial number of shares. To start telling people to call their shares at this juncture is, at best, premature. Now that I've gotten that out of my system, let me add that I've been watching this stock for longer than the 2 days I've been in and out of it. I didn't want to buy it until it was over a dollar, due to the perceived risk combined with the higher commissions I'd pay on it (Farsight) if it's under $1 (5% of the total if under $1, vs $20 per 1k shares if over). It is obvious that there has been a LOT more buying than selling. A rough guess is that there have been about 20M more shares bought than sold. That's just a guess, though. If any shorting has been done by MMs, it's been on the way up, not at the old levels. However, I'm not concerned with that quite yet. At this point in time, what I know about this company is extremely limited. I'm dying to find out more, though. The company is looking like every penny player's dream come true at the moment. That fact alone keeps this Missourian extremely skeptical. So, I would like to ask that we (myself included, but especially you, Riley) focus on fundamentals. This is currently a wonderful "story", and it'd be a lot more fun to find out more about, and verify unimpeachably, the "story", rather than worrying about such things as locking away the float. My apologies to the threadsters for my wordiness. It's just my style.