Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flashforward2009 who wrote (176543)	8/16/2021 9:52:02 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217694

And that would be why science doesn't use "self reported personal experience" as a test of validity. Placebo effect alone would handily prove everything they give you works for everything you've got... You trust them... therefore it works... doesn't actually work. I don't think anyone here has ever disputed the virus being real... so that part is an obvious red herring... ?

To: flashforward2009 who wrote (176543)	8/16/2021 11:31:49 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217694

Repeat the same news item... reporting the same news only from three different outlets each saying the exact same thing... ? CNN agrees with MSNBC... AND Fox... so its true... that alien space ships are invading the earth ? Film at 11 ? So, all I have to do is quote three different posts I wrote... or one I wrote, and two people who agreed with me... one of my posts saying the news guy I'm quoting says he read an article by an expert... therefore my opinion is the truth... ? Fox News are not a particularly credible source... as biased as any other... but, quite funny how everyone on the left are now falling all over themselves to claim it must be true... since Fox News said it ? If you have an article to link... from the Lancet... link it... and we can discuss that. They're a credible enough publication... which doesn't mean others have represented what's there accurately... and doesn't mean what they've published is the "truth" rather than someone's attempt at doing science... which now makes it subject to the criticisms of other people who know science... as that's what science IS... is free speech as applied in addressing topics that other scientists study and write about... that most scientists might care about enough to have a look at...