SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (176587)8/17/2021 2:11:12 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217651
 
1.5 per 100K?!

Whoa!

How many % of the population would get genuinely sick in any one season? 1%? 2%?

And then 1.5 per 100K of population die?

Would say, if true, a lot of someone’s really phucked up, and to top the phuckups with possible LT mRNA pollution, double whoa!!, as in whoa-whoa!!

I guess the issue then be hospital capacity that made the sickness bad. If so, build hospitals.



To: maceng2 who wrote (176587)8/17/2021 9:23:26 AM
From: arun gera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217651
 
<Is there anything else out there that is more important than 1.5 deaths per 100k?>

Homicides?

1.5 deaths in 100k over 7 days, would be 10 times the homicide rate in the US.

cdc.gov

-Arun


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News