Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (176638)	8/17/2021 4:56:00 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 217739

For now, IMO, best idea is still to be careful enough to not get it... That includes reducing risks and upping relevant efforts in sustaining functional immune systems... along with "backups" in the event of failures... Anticipating future requirements... necessary in relation to risk management, including potential supply chain disruptions... Spares in supplies... and alternatives in preventives... In some places, self treatment could become necessary as the only option if history is a useful guide... but, probably not possible without prior provisioning... Large variations depending on venue in what's accessible... I may find it useful to undertake an formal analysis of alternatives in relation to projections of future risks... Naturally devolved viruses are unlikely to become greater risks... but, that may be less true of the intelligent design drivers and constraints in artificially created risks... where the literature is likely illuminating... the tolls constraining... the modes intrinsically slaved to links in purpose... so awareness of the agenda narrowing the paths of concern... Categories and modes of functions are not intrinsic constraints in natural systems... but natural systems don't tend to have a purpose providing a focus... Should point out one of the newer articles I linked did a good job in parsing risks by age... showing that the immune advantages in children begin to fade at 10 to 11 years old... explaining why they've lowered the "eligible" age to 12, here.. as that's consistent with the upper limit where the advantage of youth evaporates.