Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (208946)	8/18/2021 2:26:05 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362970

The article was about her effort to teach CRT to get around the law banning it. That's the way the article characterized it, not necessarily what she's doing. It seemed to me she was looking for a way to present material in class that did not break the law yet still teach the kids. Culturally Responsive Teaching is and has been a thing. That they have the same acronym is a coincidence. The article latched onto the acronym and, I expect, made it into a conspiracy which you bought. I have no way of evaluating whether the article's characterization is valid of biased. Can't tell without the video of what was actually said. As for culturally responsive, surely you would not want a teacher to not notice if there were Japanese American kids in the classroom when the subject of the day is Pearl Harbor. The teacher would need to be aware and careful how she framed the material. Otherwise it could be awkward and stressful. No?