SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (176850)8/21/2021 6:17:20 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 217755
 


EXPERT: CHINESE ACTIONS SHOW ‘DELIBERATE SPREAD’ OF COVID-19

Chinese leader Xi Jinping took steps in December 2019 and January 2020 “that he knew or should have known” would release COVID-19 to the world, and shows “deliberate spread of the disease,” Gordon Chang, an expert on China, told Newsmax.

“He lied about contagiousness and while locking down his own country, he was pressuring other countries not to impose travel restrictions and quarantines on arrivals from China,” Chang said of Xi.

“You put those two things together, and there are more, but you put just those two things together, and this shows that this was a deliberate spread of the disease. “

Chang said Xi “knows that he has spread” COVID-19 to the rest of the world and that he can spread the next disease “with impunity, and we know the Chinese military researchers are working on pathogens they call specific ethnic genetic attacks.”

“They will leave the Chinese immune and they will sicken and kill everybody else, which means the next disease from China could be a civilisation killer, which means that there may very well be no America afterwards,” Chang further claimed. “So if we want to protect our country, and I don’t think Biden really does. If we want to protect our country, we have to establish those costs, so China doesn’t do this again.”

In a recent speech, former US President Donald Trump called in “all nations” to work together to give China the bill for a minimum of $10 trillion to compensate for damages caused by the pandemic.

unredacted.co.uk



To: Snowshoe who wrote (176850)8/21/2021 6:28:58 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217755
 
Re << Meanwhile, is it true that China supplied weapons to the Taliban?>>

My understanding is that the Taliban arsenal are from captured Russia pile, bartered Iranian pile, and captured as well as bartered, and once upon a time gifted American pile.

I suppose trace amounts of Chinese weapons could easily have been supplied to the Taliban by Iran as well as Pakistan.

Same for Turkish weapons, etc etc

The vast majority of weapons in Afghanistan are USA sourced, without a doubt



To: Snowshoe who wrote (176850)8/22/2021 7:34:54 PM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Arran Yuan
maceng2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217755
 
Re <<Meanwhile, is it true that China supplied weapons to the Taliban?>>

... now we can conclude, 'definitely untrue'.

I paid particular attention to the question since you posited it, and on second pass appears that the biggest arms supplier to the Taliban is Team USA, and the largest suppliers of mobility to Taliban is either Toyota and Ford, not counting the Blackhawks.

China likely did not even supply flip-flops, given that Pakistan and Iran can more easily do those in the styles fitting local preference.

zerohedge.com

Meet The New Taliban 'Special Forces Look': American Car, American Weapons, American Costume

Over the past days there have been reports that the Taliban is attempting to implement some degree of greater disciplined uniformity in terms of the appearance of its forces as it prepares to "govern" war-torn Afghanistan.

There are suggestions the group could move to the look of a more professional military as part of its bid for "legitimacy" both at home and abroad. This as opposed to their typical rag-tag appearance as bearded jihadists from the mountains wearing Islamist garb. And they have a little bit of help after inheriting some $80+ million in military equipment after the US and Western coalition troop exit. "Meet the new Taliban teams, American car, American weapons, American costume," one journalist observes of a photo showing Taliban militants sporting the look of special forces.

The Taliban is also taking advantage of the ample supply of now disbanded Afghan national army uniforms, also of course previously supplied at the expense of US taxpayers.

More photos and video footage have confirmed of late that the Islamists of the internationally recognized terror organization are increasingly going around while uniformed...

There's footage that even shows a newly unveiled "Taliban Special Forces Unit"...

And yes they are outfitted with night vision googles and advanced sighting technology on their American-made rifles.

[url=][/url]

One Fox News pundit quipped this weekend over the disastrous events of the past week:

Joe Biden gave the Taliban military weapons. Not "military style" or "assault weapons" he gave them select fire rifles, drones, up armored vehicles and an assortment of munitions.


Meanwhile, apparently the Taliban are already preparing for winter 'Arctic warfare' type training, which is something typically only the world's most advanced militaries are equipped for.

And there's little doubt that the Taliban is still trying to figure out how to get those Black Hawks airborne.




To: Snowshoe who wrote (176850)8/24/2021 5:39:21 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217755
 
Re <<Meanwhile, is it true that China supplied weapons to the Taliban?>>

someone seems to have provided quite a starter set for a national army of some size that might be used for quite a false-flag operation, or as blue team fit out for rehearsals / exercises.









zerohedge.com

Quantifying The "Staggering Costs" Of US Military Equipment Left Behind In Afghanistan

Authored by Adam Andrzejewski via Forbes.com,

The U.S. provided an estimated $83 billion worth of training and equipment to Afghan security forces since 2001. This year, alone, the U.S. military aid to Afghan forces was $3 billion.

[url=][/url]

Putting price tags on American military equipment still in Afghanistan isn’t an easy task. In the fog of war – or withdrawal – Afghanistan has always been a black box with little sunshine.

Not helping transparency, the Biden Administration is now hiding key audits on Afghan military equipment. This week, our auditors at OpenTheBooks.com reposted two key reports on the U.S. war chest of military gear in Afghanistan that had disappeared from federal websites.

#1. Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit of U.S. provided military gear in Afghanistan (August 2017): reposted report (dead link: report).

#2. Special Inspector General For Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) audit of $174 million in lost ScanEagle drones (July 2020): reposted report (dead link: report).

U.S. taxpayers paid for these audits and the U.S.-provided equipment and should be able to follow the money.

After publication, the GAO spokesman responded to our request for comment, “the State Department requested we temporarily remove and review reports on Afghanistan to protect recipients of US assistance that may be identified through our reports and thus subject to retribution.” However, these reports only have numbers and no recipient information.

Furthermore, unless noted, when estimating “acquisition value,” our source is the Department Logistics Agency (DLA) and their comprehensive databases of military equipment.

Vehicles and airplanes
Between 2003 and 2016, the U.S. purchased and provided 75,898 vehicles and 208 aircraft, to the Afghan army and security forces, according to a Government Accountability Office report.

[url=][/url]

Quantities and examples of key U.S.-funded Military Vehicles for Afghanistan. OPENTHEBOOKS.COM

Here is a breakdown of estimated vehicle costs:

Armored personnel carriers such as the M113A2 cost $170,000 each and recent purchases of the M577A2 post carrier cost $333,333 each.

Mine resistant vehicles ranges from $412,000 to $767,000. The total cost could range between $382 million to $711 million.

Recovery vehicles such as the ‘truck, wrecker’ cost between for the base model $168,960 and $880,674 for super strength versions.

Medium range tactical vehicles include 5-ton cargo and general transport trucks were priced at $67,139. However, the family of MTV heavy vehicles had prices ranging from $235,500 to $724,820 each. Cargo trucks to transport airplanes cost $800,865.

Humvees – ambulance type (range from $37,943 to $142,918 with most at $96,466); cargo type, priced at $104,682. Utility Humvees were typically priced at $91,429. However, the 12,000 lb. troop transport version cost up to $329,000.

Light tactical vehicles: Fast attack combat vehicles ($69,400); and passenger motor vehicles ($65,500). All terrain 4-wheel vehicles go up to $42,273 in the military databases.

[url=][/url]

U.S.-Funded Aircraft For the Afghan Forces OPENTHEBOOKS.COM

This month, the Taliban seized Black Hawk helicopters and A-29 Super Tucano attack aircraft. As late as last month, Afghanistan’s Ministry of Defense posted photos on social media of seven newly arrived helicopters from the U.S., Reuters reported.

Black Hawk helicopters can cost up to $21 million. In 2013, the U.S. placed an order for 20 A-29 Super Tucano attack aircraft for $427 million – that’s $21.3 million for each plane. Other specialized helicopters can cost up to $37 million each.

The Afghan air force contracted for C-208 light attack airplanes in March 2018: seven planes for $84.6 million, or $12.1 million each. The airplanes are very sophisticated and carry HELLFIRE missiles, anti-tank missiles and other weaponry.

The PC-12 intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance airplanes use the latest in technology. Having these planes fall into Taliban control is disconcerting. Civilian models sell new for approximately $5 million each and the military planes could sell for many times that price.

Basic fixed-wing airplanes range in price from $3.1 million to $22 million in the DLA database.

Of course, helicopter prices also range widely depending on the technology, purpose, and equipment. For example, according to the DLA, general purpose helicopters range in price from $92,000 to $922,000. Observation helicopters can cost $92,000 and utility helicopters up to $922,000.

Even if the Taliban can’t fly our planes, the parts are very valuable. For example, just the control stick for certain military planes has an acquisition value of $17,808 and a fuel tank sells for up to $35,000.

Lost drones
In 2017, the U.S. military lost $174 million in drones that were part of the attempt to help the Afghan National Army (ANA) defend itself. But the ANA didn’t immediately use the drones and then lost track of them.

This week, the SIGAR audit on the $174 million drone loss disappeared from its website.

Weapons, communications equipment, and night vision googles
Since 2003 the U.S. gave Afghan forces at least 600,000 infantry weapons, including M16 rifles, 162,000 pieces of communication equipment, and 16,000 night-vision goggle devices, according to the GAO report.

[url=][/url]

Key Weaponry funded by U.S. into Afghanistan OPENTHEBOOKS.COM

The howitzer is the modern cannon for the U.S. military and each unit can cost up to $500,000; however most are in the $200,000 price range. At the higher end, there’s GPS guidance on fired shells.

A common price of a M16 rifle is $749, according to DLA. Adding a grenade launcher can push the price of the M16 to $12,032. M4 carbine rifles are slightly more expensive with unit prices as high as $1,278.

Just the sights on night-vision sniper rifle scopes can run as high as $35,000, however, most vary in price between $5,000 and $10,000.

Here are the costs of other types of weaponry provided to Afghan forces:

Machine guns, i.e. the M240 model, were priced between $6,600 and $9,000 each.

Grenade launchers cost between $1,000 and $5,000 each; however, in 2020, the manufacture sold 53 for $15,000 each.

Army shotguns were acquired for only $150 each, according to DLA.

Military pistols cost $320 each, such as the .40 caliber Glock Generation 3.

[url=][/url]

Key U.S.-Funded Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Equipment into Afghanistan OPENTHEBOOKS.COM

Each Aerostat surveillance balloon costs $8.9 million. Each ScanEagle drone costs approximately $1.4 million according to recent procurement news. Even as late at 2021, U.S. appropriations for the Wolfhounds radio monitoring systems approached $874,000.

Night vision devices: The total cost for the 16,000 night-vision goggles alone could run as high as $80 million. Individually, the high-tech goggles were priced between $2,742 and $5,000 by the DLA. Other equipment like image intensifiers are commonly priced at $10,747 each; however, sophisticated models run as high as $66,000 each.

Radio equipment: the cost of equipment adds up – receiver-transmitters ($210,651); sophisticated radio sets ($61,966); amplifiers ($28,165); repeater sets ($28,527); and deployment sets to identify frequencies run up to $18,908.

However, if the Taliban doesn’t have the expertise or technologies to program the equipment, it will become obsolete quickly. Or it could be sold off to other countries who wanted to acquire U.S. technology.

And there’s more… years 2017 through 2019
From 2017 to 2019, the U.S. also gave Afghan forces 7,035 machine guns, 4,702 Humvees, 20,040 hand grenades, 2,520 bombs and 1,394 grenade launchers, according to the since removed 2020 SIGAR report, reported by The Hill.

An unnamed official told Reuters that current intelligence assessment was that the Taliban took control of more than 2,000 armored vehicles, including American Humvees, and as many as 40 aircraft that may include UH-60 Black Hawks, scout attack helicopters and ScanEagle military drones.

Crucial quote
“We don't have a complete picture, obviously, of where every article of defense materials has gone, but certainly a fair amount of it has fallen into the hands of the Taliban,” White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said Tuesday, The Hill reported.

“And obviously, we don't have a sense that they are going to readily hand it over to us at the airport.”

Critic
Republican Senators have demanded that there be a full count of U.S. military equipment left in Afghanistan.

In a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, the lawmakers said they were "horrified" to see photos of Taliban militants taking hold of military equipment, including Black Hawk helicopters.

"It is unconscionable that high-tech military equipment paid for by U.S. taxpayers has fallen into the hands of the Taliban and their terrorist allies," the lawmakers said in the letter.

"Securing U.S. assets should have been among the top priorities for the U.S. Department of Defense prior to announcing the withdrawal from Afghanistan."

* * *

Further reading

Planes, guns, night-vision goggles: The Taliban's new U.S.-made war chest

Billions in US weaponry seized by Taliban

US military equipment left in Afghanistan needs full accounting, GOP senators say

Billions spent on Afghan army ultimately benefited Taliban

Note:

Procurement prices can vary widely over a 20-year period. Factors influencing prices include when the item was purchased, quantities, and other acquisition details.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (176850)8/25/2021 1:30:46 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217755
 
Re <<Meanwhile, is it true that China supplied weapons to the Taliban?>>

We have established that Taliban gets most of its armaments from Team USA, as a grant

I did some further Chinese language research and found that China strangely sells Unmanned drones to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for purposes off peace keeping in Yemen, to suppress surface equipment per here

bilibili.com taking out Russia-supplied tanks of Yemen

... and China sells unmanned drones to Yemen for the purpose of shooting down Saudi air vehicles, manned and unmanned, by air-to-air action, encouraging Saudi authorities to re-up and double down on more CH-4 drone per here

bilibili.com taking out China-supplied Saudi drones by Yemen

The Yemen conflict is tee-ed up by Saudi Arabia and given political cover by Team USA, over I have not a clue what reason, and is a humanitarian disaster best soon ended.

Perhaps the Taliban shall do something about Saudi Arabia, using its American grants

Team America cottoned on to the business model but is constrained by Capitol Hill folks from doing same business model

China sells CH-4 to Iran as well as Iraq, and supplies Saudi SKD kits for domestic assembly, without worrying about so called IP-theft. Only cretins and dullards worry about IP theft.

Drones, by China reckoning, is a consumable, and more consumption more victory

China has been working on drone tanks, dedicated design as well as conversion of old tanks, per waste not waste not or some such, and good news

In keeping with waste-not, and as China has thousands of old 50s vintage Russian-design T59 tanks, they have done a factory-warranteed refurbishment / conversion program to update the beast in order to inject new life



and also working out the details of making the beast unmanned zh.omatomeloanhikaku.com

of the 5,000+ units, 3,000 some remain to be rejuvenated to help with planetary peace-keeping




To: Snowshoe who wrote (176850)8/25/2021 1:34:47 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217755
 
good news, Team America is helping team Huawei to more closely engage w/ autonomous / self-driving vehicles :0)

likely in effort to resolve the chip shortage issue

reuters.com

EXCLUSIVE U.S. approves licenses for Huawei to buy auto chips - sources
Karen Freifeld
August 25, 20219:09 AM HKTLast Updated an hour ago

Aug 25 (Reuters) - U.S. officials have approved license applications worth hundreds of millions of dollars for China's blacklisted telecom company Huawei to buy chips for its growing auto component business, two people familiar with the matter said.

Huawei, the world's largest telecommunications equipment maker, has been hobbled by trade restrictions imposed by the Trump administration on the sale of chips and other components used in its network gear and smartphones businesses. The Biden administration has been reinforcing the hard line on exports to Huawei, denying licenses to sell chips to Huawei for use in or with 5g devices.

But in recent weeks and months, people familiar with the application process told Reuters the U.S. has granted licenses authorizing suppliers to sell chips to Huawei for such vehicle components as video screens and sensors. The approvals come as Huawei pivots its business toward items that are less susceptible to U.S. trade bans.

Auto chips are generally not considered sophisticated, lowering the bar for approval. One person close to the license approvals said the government is granting licenses for chips in vehicles that may have other components with 5g capability.

Asked about the automotive licenses, a U.S. Department of Commerce spokesperson said the government continues to consistently apply licensing policies "to restrict Huawei's access to commodities, software, or technology for activities that could harm U.S. national security and foreign policy interests."

The Commerce Department is prohibited from disclosing license approvals or denials, the person added.

A Huawei spokeswoman declined to comment on the licenses, but said: "We are positioning ourselves as a new component provider for intelligent connected vehicles, and our aim is to help car OEMs (manufacturers) build better vehicles."

Citing threats to U.S. national security and foreign policy interests, the U.S. has gone to great lengths to slow the growth of Huawei's key communications-related business.

After placing Huawei on a U.S. Commerce Department trade blacklist in 2019, which banned sales of U.S. goods and technology to the company without special licenses, the U.S. last year ratcheted up restrictions to limit the sale of chips made abroad with U.S. equipment. It also campaigned to get allies to exclude Huawei from their 5G networks over spying concerns. Huawei has denied the allegations.

Huawei reported its biggest ever revenue drop in the first half of 2021, after the U.S. restrictions drove it to sell a chunk of its once-dominant handset business and before new growth areas have fully matured.

Underscoring the shift into smart cars, the company's rotating chairman Eric Xu announced pacts with three state-owned Chinese carmakers, including BAIC Group, to supply "Huawei Inside", a smart vehicle operating system, at the Shanghai Auto Show earlier this year.

In another sign of Huawei's ambition in the space, after suppliers have received licenses authorizing the sale of tens of millions of dollars of chips to Huawei, the company has requested they apply again and request higher values such as one or two billion, one source said. Licenses are generally good for four years.

Richard Barnett, chief marketing officer at a global electronics consultancy called Supply Frame, said Huawei is in the "early innings" of trying to invest in the $5 trillion automotive market that has large potential growth both inside and outside of China.

"Cars and trucks are now computers on wheels," said Barnett, "That convergence is what's driving Huawei's strategic focus to be a bigger player in that area."

Editing by Chris Sanders and Edward Tobin

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.