Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (177051)	8/23/2021 3:42:04 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 217567

I think Powell and his words are... the wrong focus... He doesn't matter. Start here... with a comparison of gold to AIG in the same time frame ? I included the statistical price comparison graphically as the bottom element... knowing its understating the reality in "chart smoothing"... Note the timelines ? When did AIG happen... how was gold trading before and after... and why ? The "peak" in 2011 was a "fake" peak... they just pulled the plug on the trade when the NVI threatened to go positive ? What that says... on the proper scale relative to the real value (and timing) in the trading dynamic... is that gold today is really still priced at $400... only, its priced at a $400 equivalent today... when we already know about AIG and ( its representation of ) the larger issues... and we already know about the BIS and Basel III and "the plan" to re-monitize gold as an escape from the still unresolved black hole in derivatives left exposed in 2008... and its "delay" in 2011 when moving that way again caused banks to fail like they did in 2008 ? And, in theory, in January 2022... we resume where they "pressed pause" in 2011... ? The simple math... not accounting for ending and reversing the suppression trade, converting gold from being forced to be "out" in popular consideration... and not accounting for relative value in relation to what AIG shows in the alternative failing ? Just "playing the record backwards"... you set 1800 equivalent to $100 in 2001 and follow the chart backwards... to $400 in 1996-1997... to get an "un-suppressed" price equivalent today of a 4X... just to get gold back to "neutral" in relation to post 2001 manipulation (and just you never mind concern with pre-2001 manipulation dating back to 1973? ) A "base case" for gold... from which to start its longer term market rehabilitation and restoration... would put it $7200 "at the bottom" of the trade occurring as gold became popular again ?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (177051)	8/23/2021 4:33:16 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217567

I noted Powell as a distraction from what matters... The right questions at least, asked here: End of the Road: How Money Became Worthless Zoom ahead to 35:30 to hear Mike Maloney set the table... and Peter Schiff quickly picks up a fork... with the Superman allusion... Who's got the dollar ? The vid proceeds to note... when fiats fail... it has always been gold and silver that they fall back on... And, that's consistent with the direction being addressed under the Basel III "re-legitimization" plan... before proceeding to undertake even more egregious thefts in Basel IV... But... What JUST happened... that answers Schiff's question differently than Basel III's new gold mandate ? They just issued a BILLION $ worth of SDR's... and now claim it is the SDR that's "got" the dollar ? And, they say... SDR's are "magic money" that means... there is no cost to anyone... and no one ever has to repay the $ created... Ecept that's a bald faced lie... The implications are MASSIVE... including that a small portion of the $ engaged in that ploy alone now accounts for the trade driving rates ? They're kiting checks... but, also, giving a large % of the $ away... to buy cooperation ? They've created a NEW Ponzi scheme... with less credibility than the old one... but are using the take from the ACTUAL "money printing" in creating and distributing Ponzi SDR's... to sustain the dollar Ponzi a little while longer... ? But, SDR's... ARE pure money printing... purely and MASSIVELY inflationary... And, SDR's... have NO ACCOUNTABILITY ? So, there is no Fed control... and there is no one pretending that they control it as with the Fed in "oversight" and power over "appointments" ? They're all looking the other way as hard as they can... And, SDR's are "free money"... for some... but there is no free lunch... so they are theft from some with those takings being "gifted" to others... conditionally... with the too obvious in the involvement in a bit of baksheesh not a surprise ? The new Ponzi, though... is removing MORE... ten times more money being removed from the old system than the new one puts back in... and it redistributes that money... as a direct theft of $ taken from Americans being given to others... When people figure out that's what's happening... its going to get ugly... But that IS what's happening... a billion in stimulus to everyone in the world... EXCEPT Americans... with that money coming directly out of Americans pockets ?