SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcher who wrote (177353)8/27/2021 8:15:31 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217572
 
I am also <<agnostic>>, and shall remain so until not.

Knowing the nature of my strange flu does not prevent me from getting reacquainted w/ the flu, and is a hassle. Much better to chill, relax, and waste the money that otherwise would be spent on testing and onward complications (unwarranted quarantine at officialdom-invitation) instead on another or few other sessions of reflexology to boost immune system.

In the meantime I note in passing ...
The intelligence community determined the virus wasn’t created as a biological weapon and said Chinese officials had no “foreknowledge” of the outbreak
The intelligence community sprinted to provide the report within Biden’s timeline, and approached it from multiple perspectives, including consulting scientists and epidemiologists, an official familiar with the process said, speaking on condition of anonymity. The intelligence community also reached out to academic experts, as well as international allies and partners, the official said.

So, China did not design and make the virus, did not attack own mega-city Wuhan with a virus, and had to use precious time to figure out the city was under attack given no foreknowledge.

In such a setup as concluded by Team USA intelligence branches, then who, if anyone, did have foreknowledge of the biological-non-weapon and how come China was hit hard at the get-go?

The tinfoil hatted might point to some smoke ...

Message 33407791

Message 33403336

and reckon who has the track record of using biological experiments on people Message 33430919 <<Re <<Do I hear 6, 6 anyone, 6? -nfg->>>>

I remain agnostic until Team USA determination end 2024, or maybe post-2040 enables a Pulitzer Prize book based on FIA facilitating.


bloomberg.com

Biden Criticizes China for Not Aiding Report on Virus Origins

Josh Wingrove
28 August 2021, 04:19 GMT+8

President Joe Biden rebuked China for stonewalling a U.S. investigation into the origins of the coronavirus, as his administration reported it was unable to reach firm conclusions because of Beijing’s unwillingness to cooperate.

“The world deserves answers, and I will not rest until we get them,” Biden said in a statement on Friday shortly after the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released an unclassified summary of the report. “Responsible nations do not shirk these kinds of responsibilities to the rest of the world.”

The intelligence community determined the virus wasn’t created as a biological weapon and said Chinese officials had no “foreknowledge” of the outbreak, but was divided on how it came to infect humans and spread across the globe.

Four components of the intelligence community said -- with low confidence -- that the outbreak was likely linked to exposure to an infected animal, according to the summary. This theory is the most widely supported by scientists, including Anthony Fauci, who is advising Biden on Covid.

One intelligence community component assessed with moderate confidence that the outbreak was associated with a research lab in China. As of a few months ago, two components backed the animal theory while one backed the lab theory.

Analysts at other agencies are unable to coalesce around either without more information, including some who think both are equally likely. To reach a conclusion with higher confidence, the intelligence community said it would need more cooperation of China, which it said continues to hinder global efforts.

“Beijing, however, continues to hinder the global investigation, resist sharing information and blame other countries, including the United States,” the summary says. “These actions reflect, in part, China’s government’s own uncertainty about where an investigation could lead as well as its frustration the international community is using the issue to exert political pressure on China.”

The intelligence community overall believes that the virus infected humans through an initial small exposure no later than November of 2019, according to the report. The report says the intelligence agencies judge that the virus was not developed as a biological weapon, and most assess -- with low confidence -- that it was not genetically engineered, though two agencies believe there isn’t enough evidence to know either way.

“China’s officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak of COVID-19 emerged,” the summary says. But the intelligence agencies and the global community lack clinical samples and other data from the earliest Covid-19 cases, the summary says.

The report is partly a sign of how far from reach a conclusion remains. Only five of the agencies, or components, of the intelligence community expressed any view and none did so with more than low or moderate confidence.

The U.S. Intelligence Community is made up of 18 different organizations, including the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which released the summary, and the Central Intelligence Agency, among others.

The intelligence community sprinted to provide the report within Biden’s timeline, and approached it from multiple perspectives, including consulting scientists and epidemiologists, an official familiar with the process said, speaking on condition of anonymity. The intelligence community also reached out to academic experts, as well as international allies and partners, the official said.

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE