Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sense who wrote (177565)	9/1/2021 12:43:48 AM
From: Maple MAGA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217580

A lawyer acquaintance sued a private company that raised $229,000,000, he convinced the judge it was a fraud because the company never produced a 43-101 report. The judge ordered the company to prepare a 43-101 report and provide it to the court. A few months later a geologist in Montana produced an acceptable 43-101 report detailing all relevant information. It also outlined there was no proven economic resource on the property, but that is not what the judge ordered. The judge simply wanted a compliant 43-101 report and he got it, case dismissed. There is no magic or proof in a 43-101 report, it is simply a synopsis of past, present and suggestions for future work. pressreader.com Stanfield’s companies have raised at least $220,000,000 CDN in the last three and a half decades from more than 3,700 investors mainly in Alberta and Saskatchewan, yet Stanfield remained president and sole individual in possession of voting shares until the time of his death. In 2007 the sudden unexplained terminations of key tenured contract employees alarmed several investors from Edmonton, Alberta, who decided to coordinate their efforts to discover exactly what the status of the mine and their investment was. Stanfield responded with a $202 million lawsuit against them. Stanfield's Alberta lawsuit against the Galloway Twelve has been stayed in the courts pending the results of a petition the G12 launched in the province of British Columbia, to attempt to remove Ross Stanfield and to secure an independent investigation into the true value of the ore alleged to be present at Stanfield's operations, specifically regarding the companies Gallowai Metal Mining Corporation and Bul River Mineral Corporation.