SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (177792)9/5/2021 7:50:25 PM
From: sense  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217705
 
I'd note that "the" Civil War... was actually "the second Civil War"... with the first one perhaps being far more relevant to the issues today.... even if there is more interest in trying to recreate the second one... in order to shift public focus as far away from the first as possible...

The first Civil War... incorporates the War of 1812... and all of the debates in Congress through the period of time between the founding and the Jackson Presidency... considering the utility and risks in establishing a central bank... and those instances of treason in the northeastern states as they were attempting to return to English rule... a history still suppressed today, if discussed openly back then as the Hartford conspiracy... with the original similarly based in illicit trades in textiles... more than the Hartford Convention ?

In any event... Britain sacked Washington D.C., and apparently extracted some concessions that are still also apparently the subject of historical suppression... in spite of Britain "losing" the war... and, through Jackson's presidency, at least, the central bank idea having failed along with its advocates and the Federalist Party...

The second Civil War largely a re-enactment of the first... more about shifting power, control of commerce, money, banking, and the creation of a debt... than about anything else. The War of Northern Aggression created debt... along with other change in result... and, at the end of the war when Lincoln sought to eliminate the debt and return the United States to an independent economic existence free from control by the banks.... they found it convenient to kill him.

But, today... the banks aren't exactly keeping the wheels on things... They been operating under insolvency, if not legal bankruptcy, since 2008... and have thus far failed in finding any functional escapes from... failure.

So, it remains important to them to foster any sort of conflict... that works in distracting attention AWAY from banking issues... and those related (as election frauds) in terms of how power and control were consolidated, how they are exerted, and intended to be sustained... to divert attention to any other.

A part of the conflicts emerging, as always, is the assertion of certainty in outcomes... that are anything but certain... or, the needful creation of uncertainty where they should be none ?

Information warfare... is the reality for now...