SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ggersh who wrote (178073)9/10/2021 7:09:30 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219650
 
backgrounder #1 to Message 33481352

might be arguable that had the national security focused on the job at hand in Afghanistan instead of trying to cripple USA employment and stillborn USA infrastructure build the world might be on a different spot on the macro super cycle

no explaining why Africa should say no to China, but maybe America has a good case for saying same 'no'

asia.nikkei.com

China rail giant's 'American factory' braces for political storm

National security fears in Washington spread from telecom to transit
ALEX FANG, Nikkei staff writerNovember 1, 2019 18:00 JST

SPRINGFIELD, U.S. -- Elaine Boone sat in a subway car waiting, but not for the train to depart.

The pristine vehicle was suspended several feet above a factory floor in Springfield, Massachusetts, along with many others, destined to serve on Boston's Orange Line.

Boone was waiting for the camera in front of her to start rolling. The small-business owner had come to the Springfield plant of CRRC to give a testimonial on how the Chinese state-owned rolling stock manufacturer, had helped her company -- which supplies fire extinguishers and safety goggles -- grow.

"CRRC has significantly grown our business over the past two years," Boone said. "It's been a very nice business relationship."

CRRC hopes stories like Boone's, part of a larger public relations campaign called "Get the facts," will help it fend off an existential threat.

Washington, which deems CRRC's presence in the U.S. rolling stock market a national security risk, is poised to pass legislation this year to ban Chinese rail and bus manufacturers from receiving federal transit dollars through the same annual defense budget act that in 2018 prohibited Huawei Technologies and ZTEfrom doing business with the U.S. government.

Subway cars in production at CRRC's Springfield, Massachusetts, plant. (Photo by Alex Fang)
Lawmakers who demanded the provision believe CRRC's expansion in the U.S. is undercutting American industry. Some also fear the Chinese-made trains could be used in cyberwarfare.

The bill, for which the White House has indicated support, would, in effect, bar CRRC from future contracts, without which the Springfield facility will shutter in five to seven years, according to company estimates.

In 2014, CRRC won a $566 million bid to build about 400 new subway cars for the city of Boston, beating out Canada's Bombardier, Japan's Kawasaki Heavy Industries and South Korea's Hyundai Rotem with a competitive bid and a commitment to manufacture the train cars in Massachusetts.

The Boston project marked CRRC's entry into the U.S., which has no passenger train manufacturer of its own. The Chinese company later went on to bag contracts from Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Chicago, where it recently opened another factory. Together, CRRC's contracts in the country add up to $2.6 billion.

Today, CRRC's Massachusetts facility employs some 180 workers, most of them unionized. For Springfield resident Nashira Irvine, a job at the railcar factory was a step up. "Who doesn't want to be a part of building trains?" said the 35-year-old, who joked that someday she would like to stand in the middle of a train on Boston's Orange Line and proclaim to fellow riders, "My crew built this!"

CRRC's Springfield facility employs around 180 workers, most of whom are unionized. (Photo by Alex Fang)
CRRC executives do not hide their ambition to keep expanding. "There are three main goals of CRRC: multinational operation, worldwide industrial leadership and a high technical level," Cui Dianguo, then chairman of the group, said in an interview in 2015.

A since-deleted tweet by CRRC may have gone a bit overboard: "So far, 83% of all rail products in the world are operated by #CRRC or are CRRC ones. How long will it take for us conquering the remaining 17%?"

In May 2017, the Rail Security Alliance, a lobbying group representing the U.S. freight industry, sent a letter to the Bureau of Industry and Security, an agency under the Department of Commerce, to call attention to the Chinese rail group's U.S. business.

"China is strategically targeting the U.S. freight rail manufacturing sector, with a first, aggressive step into U.S. transit rail assembly," the group said in the letter.

Many on Capitol Hill came to share the freight industry's concerns, which echo a larger narrative in Sino-American trade friction, where Washington has repeatedly accused of Beijing of unfair state subsidies and espionage.

"China has made clear its intent to dismantle U.S. railcar manufacturing in its 'Made in China 2025' plan. Our economic and national security demands that we address Chinese attempts to dominate industries that build our nation's critical infrastructure," said Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin, co-sponsor of the bill that would ban Chinese companies from bidding on rail projects.

CRRC's Springfield factory was hailed by local media as the "largest industrial development the city has seen in generations." (Photo by Alex Fang)
CRRC's apparent interest in a partnership with the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority has also alarmed New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, who is also the Democratic Party's Senate leader.

"Given what we know about how cyberwarfare works, and recent attacks that have hit transportation and infrastructure hubs across the country, the Department of Commerce must give the green light and thoroughly check any proposals or work China's CRRC does on behalf of the New York subway system, including our signals, Wi-Fi and more," Schumer said in a May statement.

Vince Conti, director of CRRC's Springfield facility, found such cybersecurity concerns groundless.

"I would ask them to come and look at the facts, and understand how these vehicles are built, who they are built by, and where the material comes from," said Conti, who joined CRRC from Bombardier. "We build everything to the same specifications as our competitors."

"The software is proprietarily owned by the vendors that provide the equipment," Conti said, explaining that CRRC does not have access to such software, nor the ability to modify it.

But that does not mean a security breach is impossible, said Timothy Heath, a senior defense research analyst at RAND Corp.

"The Chinese have every incentive to [abide by the rules], currently," Heath said. "But I think the concern is if the U.S. and China found themselves in a crisis and relations [were] very bad, the Chinese government... can direct people... to carry out operations for sabotage or intelligence collection.

"Same with Huawei. We don't have evidence that Huawei is doing anything nefarious now, but we know that they are a Chinese company, and there are Chinese laws that obligate Huawei and Chinese rail manufacturers to cooperate with national security officials in any situation, to do any task the government asks," he said.

Amid all the attention CRRC is getting from Washington, workers like Irvine find themselves tuning in to news about their factory more and more.

"It's our livelihood. Of course we've got to worry about it," she said. "We just hope that it gets better, and not all turning to negative."



To: ggersh who wrote (178073)9/10/2021 7:09:34 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 219650
 
backgrounder #2 to Message 33481352

Sanctions work wonders internationally, and therefore efficacious domestically, I guess that is what the article is trying to say

sure looks like the Chinese army is everywhere, except Afghanistan

reuters.com

China's CRRC should be sanctioned by U.S., lobby groups say

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. rail, steel and manufacturing groups are calling on the Trump administration to use its most powerful sanctioning tool against China’s CRRC after the Pentagon announced the world’s largest maker of passenger trains was backed by the Chinese military.

FILE PHOTO: A CRRC's logo is seen at an exhibition during the World Intelligence Congress in Tianjin, China May 16, 2019. REUTERS/Jason Lee

In a letter sent on Tuesday, the Rail Security Alliance, the United Steelworkers and others urged U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin to invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) against the company, which has clinched key passenger rail contracts in Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago and Los Angeles by underbidding rivals.

The law allows the administration to kick a company out of the U.S. banking system, bar American firms or citizens from trading or conducting financial transactions with the sanctioned party, and freezes assets held in the United States.

“We write to encourage the imposition of immediate, meaningful, and permanent sanctions on CRRC for the continued protection of the economic and national security of the United States,” said the letter, which was also signed by the American Foundry Society, the American Iron and Steel Institute and the Alliance for American Manufacturing.

The letter comes amid rising tensions between Beijing and Washington over the deadly coronavirus pandemic and China’s move to curb freedoms in Hong Kong.

The U.S. Defense Department last month released a list of 20 companies, including CRRC, allegedly owned or controlled by the Chinese military, or People’s Liberation Army. The list was mandated by a 1999 law that gives the president the option of imposing IEEPA penalties against listed firms.

“Now is the time for the Administration to take immediate action against CRRC, which has been declared to be under the control of the PLA and which has demonstrated itself to be working against our national interests,” the groups said.

CRRC representatives and the Treasury Department did not respond to requests for comment.

The Rail Security Alliance, a freight lobbying group made up of manufacturers, suppliers, and steel workers, was formed 4-1/2 years ago to oppose CRRC’s rapid expansion in the U.S. passenger rail market.

While there are no U.S. passenger-car builders, CRRC’s success has fueled a backlash by American freight companies, which fear the company will encroach on the country’s far bigger freight car market.

A law passed last year bars federal funds from going to Chinese state-owned companies such as CRRC.

Reporting by Alexandra Alper; Editing by Tom Brown



To: ggersh who wrote (178073)9/10/2021 7:09:38 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219650
 
backgrounder #3 to Message 33481352

terrible Chinese trying to help out N America for own evil purpose, whereas GM, GE, F, etc etc are doing best to do good in China

governing.com

As China Builds Transit Cars for U.S. Cities, Congress Seeks to Ban Them

The state-owned China Railway Rolling Stock Corp is building rail cars for some of America's biggest cities, prompting cybersecurity concerns and bipartisan legislation in the U.S. Senate.

March 11, 2019 •
Candice Norwood


Visitors look at model subway trains on display at the stand of CRRC during the 2015 Beijing International Urban Rail Transport Technology Exhibition.
(Imaginechina/Wu changqing via AP)

SPEED READ:
The state-owned China Railway Rolling Stock Corp. has won contracts to build rail cars for some of America's biggest cities, including Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and Philadelphia.CRRC may bid on contracts in New York City and Washington, D.C.Citing cybersecurity concerns, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators introduced a bill to prevent transit agencies from using federal funding to purchase rail cars manufactured by state-owned Chinese companies. State and local government agencies have become increasingly vulnerable to cyberattacks -- particularly when it comes to public transportation.

In 2016, hackers hit the San Francisco transit system with a ransomware attackdemanding $70,000. The following year, Sacramento Regional Transit faced a similar strike. In 2018, the Colorado Department of Transportation shut down 2,000 computers after falling victim to two ransomware attacks in two weeks.

Faced with these kinds of new cyberthreats, a number of security officials and experts have focused attention on one potential source: China. Chinese hackers have not been accused of the transit ransomware attacks, but they have been blamed for hacking other U.S. government agencies and businesses in an effort to gain intelligence and trade secrets. The growing political tensions between the U.S. and China have culminated in a series of tariffs on Chinese goods.

Meanwhile, a state-owned Chinese company is building rail cars for some of America's biggest cities, prompting cybersecurity concerns. The increasing role of the China Railway Rolling Stock Corp. (CRRC) has prompted a bipartisan group of U.S. senators to introduce legislation that would prevent transit agencies from using federal funding for rail-car contracts with companies that are owned, controlled or subsidized by China.

By significantly underbidding other companies, CRRC has won rail-car contracts in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and Philadelphia. In 2017, the Chinese company reportedly lost out on a bid with the New York City subway to the Japanese company Kawasaki Heavy. Now, CRRC has eyes on a contract with the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority again and may soon bid to design and build rail cars for Washington, D.C.’s metro system.

The potential D.C. deal has sparked a clash between local transportation officials and federal lawmakers.

In a January letter to the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority (WMATA), U.S. senators from Maryland and Virginia raised concerns “in regards to the procurement process that WMATA is currently undertaking to acquire new rail cars.” The letter does not name China or CRRC directly but says state and local procurements become a problem if they “involve foreign governments that have explicitly sought to undermine our country’s economic competitiveness and national security.”

"U.S. national security should be of the utmost importance as WMATA considers bids," the senators wrote.

Usually, public entities pick the cheapest bid. If Congress wants D.C. to use a more expensive manufacturer, Washington City Councilmember and WMATA Board Chairman Jack Evans told The Washington Post that the federal government would "need to subsidize the difference."

Economic and National Security ConcernsThe concerns over CRRC’s growth in the U.S. center on economic and national security, says Erik Olson, vice president of the Rail Security Alliance, which advocates for a ban on contracts with Chinese state-owned companies.

From an economic standpoint, Olson says CRRC’s U.S.-based manufacturing plant provides fewer local jobs than other popular foreign rail-car manufacturers, such as German-owned Siemens. Also, by underbidding competitors by millions, CRRC enables some local governments and transit agencies to fully fund rail-car projects on their own rather than seeking federal funding. When this happens, CRRC could bypass federal “Buy America” requirements, according to Olson. The 1982 regulations require that 60 percent of the cost for components used in transit projects go to American sources; that number will increase to 70 percent in October.

Regarding cybersecurity, opponents of the CRRC contracts worry the company will install surveillance devices on the rail cars that it builds. Such a possibility could be especially unsettling in Washington, D.C., the nation's capital.

“We’re not saying they are going to blow up the subway system,” Olson says. “There’s a lot of technology used on these cars. … We’re talking about [China] gathering intelligence.”

To Ban or Not to Ban?Last week, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators introduced the Transit Infrastructure Vehicle Security Act, which would "prevent federal funds from being used by transit agencies to purchase rail cars or buses manufactured by Chinese government-owned, controlled or subsidized companies," according to a press release.

The ban, however, wouldn't affect projects that don't receive federal aid, such as the Boston transit agencies' CRRC contract and the D.C. procurement.

Congressional lawmakers introduced similar regulations last year as part of the appropriations process. The House and Senate both passed bills including the foreign contract ban, but it was removed from the final legislation.

While groups like the Rail Security Alliance support the ban, other security experts say that level of concern may be unwarranted.

Timothy Heath, a senior international defense research analyst for the RAND Corporation, says he is “not totally persuaded” that CRRC presents a real security threat at this point. CRRC’s U.S. rail contracts don't include developing software or computer components for the cars. The separation between hardware and software manufacturing makes any desired hacking much more difficult, Heath says.

Transit Officials on the DefenseIn defense of their CRRC contracts, local transit officials say cybersecurity concerns extend beyond China. As technology becomes more sophisticated, they say it's best to be prepared.

“[We’ve] had talks since they started the preliminary designs to make sure cybersecurity is considered from the very beginning,” says David Collins, a senior project leader for Philadelphia's transit system. “It’s not something that we’re just adding on at the end.”

Los Angeles Metro spokesman Dave Sotero touted his agency’s ability to take appropriate precautions.

“Metro has the means and expertise to assure that any threats to security are identified and mitigated,” says Sotero. “Metro oversees all elements of vehicle design and system integration, and has the ability and intention to validate software and hardware integrity.”

As for Washington, D.C., WMATA is still in talks with other companies, but has added "enhanced" cybersecurity safeguards to procurements.



To: ggersh who wrote (178073)9/10/2021 7:09:42 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
ggersh

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219650
 
backgrounder #4 to Message 33481352

dastardly common-prosperity Chinese subsidising infrastructure-build of other nations

wsj.com

Chinese Manufacturers Sidestep Trade Barriers by Buying Factories Overseas

Beijing subsidizes state-owned companies that acquire Western rivals or build plants in other countries; ‘appetite for economic conquest’

By
May 6, 2021 11:15 am ET

PARIS—For decades, France’s Valdunes SAS charged premium prices for the wheels it made for high-speed trains and other rail systems around the world. That strategy changed after a Chinese state-owned industrial conglomerate bought the company in 2014.

The new owner, Maanshan Iron & Steel Co., or MA Steel, slashed prices in a bid to dominate the market.

“We were told that we shouldn’t miss a single order. That was explicit,” recalled Jérôme Duchange, Valdunes’s former top executive in France. “They have an appetite for economic conquest.”

The French firm was now in the service of the steel company’s larger strategic goals—to give it the know-how to make wheels for high-speed trains in Chinese factories, and to gain access to Europe’s highly regulated rail sector and other markets world-wide. For that, Valdunes received low-cost credit from Chinese government banks and 150 million euros, equivalent to $181 million, from MA Steel to stay afloat.

Over the past decade, China has provided billions of dollars of subsidies to state-owned companies to acquire Western manufacturing rivals and to build factories beyond its own borders. Now, these overseas factories are roiling global markets with low-price goods in sectors ranging from automotive tires and rail equipment to fiberglass and steel.

“Chinese companies are expanding. They are investing everywhere,” said Luisa Santos, deputy director of BusinessEurope, the region’s main business association. “This means that the flaws we see in the Chinese market are now being exported to other markets.”

The European Union this week proposed legislation to rein in companies in Europe that are subsidized by foreign governments, one of a series of measures that aim to counter the global expansion of Chinese firms.

Zhang Ming, the Chinese ambassador to the 27-nation bloc, has said Europe’s stance has worried Chinese investors in the region and undermined the EU’s historical openness to foreign investment. “We often see the EU as our professor for building our market economy,” Mr. Zhang said. “So we don’t want to see our professor and our partner have any hesitation when it comes to these principles.”

The U.S. and nations in Europe and elsewhere also subsidize their own industries, often through tax breaks, export financing and research-and-development funding. What makes China different is the outsize role state-controlled companies play in its economy, and its willingness to support their expansion abroad.

Daniel Gros, an economist at the Centre for European Policy Studies, a think tank in Brussels, said those differences shouldn’t lead the EU to penalize China for investing abroad. “Sorry, we cannot export our own model,” he said. “And we have lots of other subsidies. The footprint of our governments in our economies is very, very large.”

The U.S. and Europe have long relied on the World Trade Organization and tariffs to penalize China for subsidizing exports with grants, tax breaks and credit from state-owned banks, measures that helped the country grow rapidly. But the WTO rules weren’t written to constrain subsidies that a government gives to its manufacturers overseas.

The result: Chinese-owned factories outside of China usually face lower tariffsthan those imposed on factories inside the country—or escape them altogether.

Western officials and executives say financial support from the Chinese government allows Chinese-owned manufacturers overseas to operate on razor-thin margins or at a loss, while they grab market share or serve the strategic objectives of the government. The problem, they say, is particularly difficult to address when the manufacturer in question is operating inside a Western market.

“China may never care about a profit because it’s a nonmarket economy,” said Michael Wessel, a member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, which advises Congress on China policy. “We have to assess whether as a market economy we view that as acceptable.”

The commission is recommending Congress give the Federal Trade Commission the authority to block acquisitions by foreign companies that receive government subsidies, particularly if those funds are used to execute the transaction. It also says U.S. authorities should have the power to screen plans by Chinese-owned companies to build factories in the U.S. for potential threats to national and economic security.

The EU’s proposed legislation would allow the European Commission, the bloc’s executive arm, to stop acquisitions by companies subsidized by a foreign government or impose restrictions on them to stop distortions of the European market.

EU rules restrict how much aid member states can give the private sector. The bloc’s officials say the subsidies legislation aims to level the playing field: Chinese companies in Europe wouldn’t be allowed to benefit from Chinese government subsidies when European companies are forbidden similar support from their own governments.

China says the West’s criticism of its practices amounts to an attempt to stifle its economic development. “Major Western countries formulate most of the rules of world trade,” Hua Chunying, spokeswoman of China’s foreign ministry, said last month. “It is their customary practice to maintain their hegemony.”

To maintain access to the European market, the Chinese government is offering to remove restrictions on investment by European companies in China’s domestic economy, part of a preliminary investment deal struck with the EU in December. The EU says it is moving forward with the foreign-subsidies legislation regardless of the investment agreement.

The U.S. in January imposed antidumping tariffs on tires from Thailand, South Korea and Vietnam after Chinese companies set up production in those countries to escape Western tariffs on tires imported from China. The Chinese investments helped transform Thailand into the world’s biggest exporter of tires. Chinese companies also are building tire factories in Algeria, Serbia and elsewhere to export to the West without antidumping tariffs.


The entrance to a Chinese-run industrial zone in Egypt where Chinese glass fiber manufacturers have built factories.Photo: Wu Huiwo/Xinhua/Getty Images
The EU last year levied tariffs against Chinese glass fiber manufacturers that built factories in a Chinese-run industrial zone in Egypt. EU investigators found that the Chinese companies in Egypt had received hundreds of millions of dollars in loans and funds transfers that were either provided directly by China’s state-controlled banks or funneled through the Egyptian subsidiaries’ parent companies in China. The Chinese companies are challenging the tariffs at the European Court of Justice.

In February, the EU opened a probe into Chinese government subsidies for building one of the world’s largest stainless-steel smelters in a special zone in Indonesia.

China Railway Rolling Stock Corp., or CRRC, a state-controlled rail giant, has built two factories in the U.S. The investments helped CRRC win over local politicians and satisfy rules that require a minimum percentage of goods purchased by public-transit agencies to be made in the U.S. CRRC underpriced the nearest competitors by as much as 20%, securing contracts with Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and Philadelphia, according to U.S. government documents.

In 2019, Congress passed a law that forbids using federal transportation funds to purchase passenger railcars and buses made by Chinese-owned firms. But CRRC won a grace period that allows the company to receive funds for new contracts for two years, thanks to allies in Congress such as Democratic Rep. Richard Neal, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, whose Massachusetts district is home to one of CRRC’s U.S. factories. Rep. Neal said he wants to extend the grace period indefinitely.

Marina Popovic, general counsel of the CRRC subsidiary that is building the cars for Chicago, said the company is determined to stay in the U.S. passenger rail market.

When MA Steel bought Valdunes for just €13 million, the French company was in financial trouble. MA Steel saw the acquisition as a way to expand its overseas sales channels—Valdunes’s brand is well-known in the industry—and to acquire know-how to make precision wheels for high-speed trains.

The company, renamed MG-Valdunes, got support from state-owned banks such as the Bank of China and China Construction Bank, according to corporate documents, receiving credit at interest rates of 1% to 2%.

After observing Valdunes for a year, MA Steel told the company’s French executives to ensure that its order book was filled, regardless of the price and the cost of production, former executives said.

That strategy caused losses to balloon, they said. Mr. Duchange, the former CEO, said MA Steel officials told him Valdunes could raise prices again after taking market share. Mr. Duchange recalled that one MA Steel executive explained the strategy with a Chinese saying: “There is no such thing as barren land, only farmers who don’t work enough.”


Chinese leader Xi Jinping visited a MA Steel factory in China last year. China’s largest steel company, China Baowu, absorbed MA Steel in 2019.Photo: Wang Ye/Zuma Press
Valdunes and MA Steel didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Valdunes began to export low-price wheels to Australia for mining operations. The surge of imports from both Valdunes and MA Steel’s plants in China led Australia to impose antidumping tariffs against the two companies.

The same year, as losses mounted, MA Steel’s board approved another €70 million in capital for the French company. “Valdunes is a bridge for the company to further penetrate into Europe and other overseas markets,” MA Steel said at the time.

MA Steel has used Valdunes to navigate the procurement rules of big European wheel purchasers such as Deutsche Bahn, Germany’s state rail company. Chinese rail-wheel exports to the EU have nearly quadrupled since Valdunes was purchased by MA Steel.

MA Steel sent Valdunes engineers to help its factories in China make wheels for high-speed trains. Those wheels require far more precise engineering than the ones MA Steel already makes for freight trains. China’s vast high-speed train network still uses wheels made in partnerships with European manufacturers.

Deutsche Bahn is now testing high-speed-train wheels made by MA Steel in China. MA Steel has increasingly used Valdunes to finish and package wheels for customers in Europe and elsewhere that were made in China.

“The fear was that, little by little, we wouldn’t produce in France anymore,” said Mr. Duchange, who left Valdunes in 2019. “But for certain products, we couldn’t resist.”

Toward the end of 2019, MA Steel was absorbed into China Baowu, the country’s largest steel company, which is owned by the central government. Under the new ownership, MA Steel said its rail business is continuing the strategy of global expansion using Valdunes.

“The Biden administration shows great interest in the development of rail transportation,” said MA Steel chairman Ding Yi when discussing the company’s results in March, “which provides us with a great opportunity.”

Write to Matthew Dalton at Matthew.Dalton@wsj.com



To: ggersh who wrote (178073)9/10/2021 7:11:13 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219650
 
Re <<why do you continue to make me read Propaganda(Bloomberg) News>>

... because we must help each other keep healthy by laughing everyday, at least twice

Speaking of which, following on to the backgrounder giggles #1 ... #4

#1 Message 33481346

#2 Message 33481347

#3 Message 33481348

#4 Message 33481349

... and some videos ...







You see, it is the fault of the human finger, and not because the NYC equipment is 1940s technology needing gutting by placing an on-line order to the China China China Rail branch factory in USA banned out of existence due to trains and trams spying.

thehill.com
Closing the China-US transportation gap
washingtonpost.com
The government screwed up the American rail system. Now it can make amends.
Bad regulation turned the U.S. rail system from a world leader to an also-ran. Now, Congress has another chance.


governing.com
As China Builds Transit Cars for U.S. Cities, Congress Seeks to Ban Them
The state-owned China Railway Rolling Stock Corp is building rail cars for some of America's biggest cities, prompting cybersecurity concerns and bipartisan legislation in the U.S. Senate.


bloomberg.com

NYC Subway Failed Because Someone Pushed the Wrong Button
David R Baker
11 September 2021, 00:31 GMT+8

New York’s subway shut down for five hours in August, stranding hundreds of passengers in tunnels and crippling transit across the city, because someone pushed the wrong button.

An unidentified worker pushed an “emergency power off” button on a power distribution unit within the system’s Rail Control Center, according to engineering firms HDR and WSP, hired by the state to investigate the Aug. 29 failure.

Although utility Consolidated Edison Inc. experienced a momentary power interruption to the subway system at 8:25 p.m. at the start of the incident, that interruption only lasted milliseconds and could not, by itself, explain the subway’s failure, according to the firms. The button was missing a protective plastic cover that was supposed to prevent accidental pushing.

HDR and WSP recommended installing redundant equipment to eliminate the possibility of similar failures in the future. They also called for improving organization of the Rail Control Center’s maintenance, whose lack of clear guidelines for restoration work contributed to the center being without power for 84 minutes.

“I am directing mitigation steps to ensure riders are not interrupted by these causes ever again,” New York Governor Kathy Hochul said Friday in a statement announcing the findings. “New Yorkers deserve absolute confidence in a fully functioning subway system, and it is our job to restore that confidence.”

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE