SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Creative Labs (CREAF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jon Tara who wrote (9379)2/5/1998 11:38:00 AM
From: prakash  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13925
 
Jon, I can back that up. I was surprised when he sent me an email that he was long on CREAF. Also he told me that he sold his positions for a loss and that he was going to wait until stock dropped further, which never happened. I guess now he is bearish on the stock as a result.

Prakash



To: Jon Tara who wrote (9379)2/5/1998 2:04:00 PM
From: Vanni Resta  Respond to of 13925
 
Jon Tara: I didn't take a "big" loss. If you call that big, then you are small. It's all a matter of perspective.

And the money I have made with what otherwise would be sitting useless in Creaf has been quite a lot, and more than made up for it. Also, if that small amount "shocks" you, then you get "shocked" way too easily.

As I recall, you were more "shocked" to find out that I was long Creaf, because you mistakenly thought I was being negative about the stock, and because you persist in the foolish notion that posts at SI have an effect on the stock market (hahahaha!), and that people would post here to try to affect a stock price. Hahahaha! Only a cretin would believe that.

And, let's not get into giving me orders again, ok? As far as I know, no one made you the thread Nazi. Are you a dethroned sibling?

Happy Investing!

Vanni



To: Jon Tara who wrote (9379)2/6/1998 3:08:00 PM
From: LR  Respond to of 13925
 
Jon,

Have long appreciated your input.
What movement do you see for CREAF over the next month?

Thanks,
LR