Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : A New Age In Gold Refining -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lee Bush who wrote (578)	2/5/1998 2:38:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 672

Yes Lee and Mike; and all, there is a Santa Claus:<<observed say large areas of tertiary lying beneath say ordovician with no evidence of overthrust deformation? Dr. Kimball cites the Lewis Overthrust in Montana and Alberta as an example. Very large block of stuff with reverse order stratigraphy. Perhaps I should post this elsewhere..>> The overthrust is the key in the formations of The Goodies in Nature. Imagine the heat and friction of two great plates meeting in central western Arizona (befor its own Creation) and that EVENT was the spark of life for the minerals that we now write about on these resource threads. Metaporphic more than igneous. A metamoephis of creation, as such. In this one example of many possible examples. Truth lies in the many. Chuca2fewwords

To: Lee Bush who wrote (578)	2/5/1998 8:46:00 PM
From: Michael J. Wendell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 672

Hi Lee, There has been what is referred to as reccumbant folding. That is where sediment formations have been overturned due to thrust drag. In that case the sediments are in reverse order, but still in order. Now for the stars and the Hubbel; is that not the effort that met with serious technical difficulties? In space there are stars. No one has ever to my knowledge seen two stars in close proximity to each other nor do they seem to crash into each other. One explanation is that for every energy there is an opposite energy. Gravity would therefor have antigravity. The gravity might work in close proximity, but in a great universe it can repel, one star from the other. The effects of anti gravity combined with the effects of gravity and who knows what the billions of options look like or produce. We are looking for a fleeting moment. If we expand today, tomorrow we may shrink back until such a time as we can expand again. Are gravitational pulls or antigravity effects rotational? Again, my particular moment is just too small. How about yours? mike