SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (178491)9/18/2021 2:25:55 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217737
 
the issue is that the age of submarine is done done

and the pigmy domain that is Australia needs submarine to protect its trade with china like it needs submarine to protect its trade with Russia



good precedence, as far as mission creep and design evolution goes, for the next 25 years :0)

the Bradley en.wikipedia.org
During the Gulf War, M2 Bradleys destroyed more Iraqi armored vehicles than the M1 Abrams.[22] A total of 20 Bradleys were lost—three by enemy fire and 17 due to friendly fire incidents; another 12 were damaged. The gunner of one Bradley was killed when his vehicle was hit by Iraqi fire, possibly from an Iraqi BMP-1, during the Battle of 73 Easting.[23] To remedy some problems that were identified as contributing factors in the friendly fire incidents, infrared identification panels and other marking/identification measures were added to the Bradleys.


In the Iraq War, the Bradley proved vulnerable to improvised explosive device and rocket-propelled grenade attacks, but casualties were light with the crew able to escape. In 2006, total losses included 55 Bradleys destroyed and some 700 others damaged.[24][25] By 2007, the Army had stopped using the M2 Bradley in combat, instead favoring more survivable MRAPs.[8] By the end of the war, about 150 Bradleys had been destroyed.[26]





To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (178491)9/18/2021 5:19:30 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217737
 
Re <<I know with a choice of diesel or nuclear>>

... and the choice is about peace against war, adding to the already rowdy 'tyranny vs choice' covid policy issue, etc etc etc

all very exciting and time-absorbing, like Charmagne soaking up poo

forward to the federal election

edition.cnn.com
Explainer: Australia's nuclear-powered submarine deal is fueling anger in the country. Here's why
bloomberg.com
Police Use Pepper Spray At Protest in Australia