Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (178590)	9/19/2021 4:34:01 PM
From: THE ANT	3 Recommendations Recommended By isopatch jazzlover2 SirWalterRalegh Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217908

Its a non permanent gene therapy that introduces mRNA but does not alter DNA. The mRNA can go tomultiple organs and create spike protiens. The antibody response to the spike proteins is permanent and in that sense it is a vaccine The mRNA is disolved in lipid nano particles. Each step has potential novel adverse side effects. The FDA laughed at Fauci when he tried to Patent mRNA as a vaccine. The only way they could make an end run around this was if there were no available alternate treatments.That is why they had to insist that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin do not work. They had to make sure there was no treatments that worked. Pharmacy and Fauci are literally killing Americans for financial gain. Biden is doing it for political gain

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (178590)	9/19/2021 5:10:04 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217908

As I appreciate it, mRNA somehow mimics the virus’s spike proteins, creating an anti-body response which is long-lasting, though there’s some debate about its longevity. This has been known for a long time. Absolutely not a secret. The issue has been the delivery system into cells. It is the main reason why it did not take decades for the various mRNA vaccine to be developed. Pfizer, Moderna, etc., we’re working on a suitable delivery system. They solved the problem by using a lipid. mRNA vaccines do not get into our DNA, they have a short life once injected, and are not associated with any significant risks, though obviously long term effects are not known. In my own personal view, long term effects are negligible because of the vaccine simply does not stay in anyone’s body long enough to cause a chronic problem. The vaccine stays in one’s body long enough to do its job, then is expelled. The most recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine concluded with regard to the Pfizer vaccine as follows: nejm.org “In the vaccination analysis, the vaccinated and control groups each included a mean of 884,828 persons. Vaccination was most strongly associated with an elevated risk of myocarditis (risk ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55 to 12.44; risk difference, 2.7 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.6), lymphadenopathy (risk ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 2.05 to 2.78; risk difference, 78.4 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 64.1 to 89.3), appendicitis (risk ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.01; risk difference, 5.0 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 0.3 to 9.9), and herpes zoster infection (risk ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.73; risk difference, 15.8 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 8.2 to 24.2). SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantially increased risk of myocarditis (risk ratio, 18.28; 95% CI, 3.95 to 25.12; risk difference, 11.0 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 5.6 to 15.8) and of additional serious adverse events, including pericarditis, arrhythmia, deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and thrombocytopenia.” I’ll take those odds any day in order to avoid even a minor case of the disease. That it definitely protects against death or hospitalization seals it for me. The Moderna jab, which I took, I believe has even better numbers.