SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: robert b furman who wrote (8052)10/2/2021 6:59:44 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13803
 
"Let's be patient and not declare victory on inflation," Evans said in an online webinar with Princeton University's Bendheim Center for Finance.


Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans on Thursday said he believes that the supply shocks that are pushing up on prices now will ease next year, and low interest rates will still be needed to bring U.S. inflation back durably to 2%.







To: robert b furman who wrote (8052)10/5/2021 10:28:20 PM
From: John Vosilla2 Recommendations

Recommended By
elmatador
Haim R. Branisteanu

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13803
 
2024 going to be the new 2008. How long will they be able to keep interest rates so low? The longer this goes on the worse it will be on the backside and it’s global. I read Germany has highest Inflation rate since 1993. At that time their 10 year treasury was at 6% now it’s at -.25%



To: robert b furman who wrote (8052)10/12/2021 3:23:51 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13803
 
Hi Bob!

On the transitory thing

Leadership Insights: UK Central Bank Governor Andrew Bailey

Andrew Bailey, Bank of England Governor, speaks to Global Finance about the aftermath of the pandemic and inflation rates.

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 Author: ANITA HAWSER

Global Finance: What are some of the biggest challenges central banks face post-pandemic?

Andrew Bailey: What we are experiencing is a bumpy economic recovery. I'm not surprised by that in some ways. It has been exacerbated by supply chain issues we are experiencing in the world economy, which is part of the story behind the higher rates of inflation we are seeing. Moving forward, there are several challenges for central banks. Is inflation going to be temporary or transitory? If you look through the medium term, our two-to three-year forecast curves suggest we have every reason to think it will be transitory. You must remember prices were low a year ago, so some of it is because of an arithmetical effect. We've also seen strong increases in commodity prices.

There have also been some supply chain blockage effects of Covid-19, and the relative imbalance of goods and services. Goods demand remains strong, which is putting pressure on supply chains and prices. That's also reflected in the labor market. We're now seeing job vacancies are at a much higher level. There are approximately two million people not in active employment relative to pre-Covid levels. We need to see that labor supply come back. If that doesn't happen, it will place even more upward pressure on inflation.

GF: While inflation is currently within the Bank of England's 2% target band, it is expected to reach 4% by year end. What does that mean in terms of the bank's current stance on interest rates?

Bailey: Inflation is currently within the Bank of England's target band, but we expect it to rise in the next reading. A good example of this is second-hand car prices, which are linked to supply chain issues with semi-conductor chips. We saw a sharp fall in the production of new vehicles, which pushed up the price of cars. In our latest monetary policy report published in August, we indicated that we're heading towards a path of inflation, which in order to bring it back on target we reasonably expect there needs to be some increase in interest rates in the next two years to achieve that path.

GF: In 2020, given the “unusual uncertainty” surrounding the UK economy, negative interest rates weren't ruled out by the Bank of England. Where do you currently stand on negative interest rates?

Bailey: We see them as something in our monetary policy toolkit We have done work with banks and ourselves to enable our systems to handle negative rates. But I don't think it is in our immediate future. It is a tool we could use, but we've had no policy discussions about doing it.

GF: Quantitative easing versus negative rates–what is the most effective monetary policy tool?

Bailey: We know a lot about the transmission of monetary policy when we are in a normal [economic] setting. But we've never used negative rates, so our knowledge is much less. We can observe what has happened in the small number of countries, including the European Central Bank, where they have been used. What we've discovered is that the economic context seems to be important. None of the central banks using negative rates made their rates more negative during the pandemic. They preferred to use Quantitative Easing (QE). In my mind there is a strong degree of state contingency. There is also a complex relationship between negative rates and how the banking system would respond to it.

Quantitative Easing is mostly effective in extraordinary market conditions. It tends to keep interest rates down further along the curve. Even in more normal market conditions it can be used to reduce risk, which is one reason why we have done further Quantitative Easing.

The Federal Reserve's QE is open ended, but we announced a fixed stock of QE, which will run out in December this year. When that happens, we would have to take a decision to do more. There are different views between central banks on open-ended QE vs. fixed stock. I'm not saying the QE we've chosen is better. We don't have the same sort of financial system others have. But it is the one we prefer. The markets have factored in the end of QE, and the view is that we won't announce any more.

GF: Several central banks are launching central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots. Where does the Bank of England stand on digital currencies in general?

Bailey: Digital currencies are one of the Bank of England's strategic priorities in terms of new work. We need to have a strong understanding of the implications of digital currencies for the financial system, which is an under researched area. We have a lot of work to do there. The Bank of England published a discussion paper in June on digital money. I'm not against CBDCs, but it's important when you're doing something like this to have a firm understanding of what the underlying problem is you're trying to solve.

Climate change is another important objective. There are two areas of focus. One is the question of how it impacts our corporate bond portfolio, which isn't that big, but big enough to incentivize climate consistent transformation in areas such as disclosure standards.

We are also testing the resilience of the financial system and firms we supervise. We are running an exploratory exercise now testing banks against a few climate stress scenarios. Again, the macroeconomic impacts of climate change are an area where relatively little work has been done and more insights are needed.



To: robert b furman who wrote (8052)10/13/2021 2:33:27 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13803
 
World economy has been booming !

S&P Global Ratings upgraded its 2021 European growth forecast last week to 5.1% from 4.4%, citing rapid improvements in economic output, the labor market and high levels of corporate investment.


Latin America’s recovery, helped by much higher commodity prices, is expected to be just above the global average at 6.5%.




“Delta? What Delta?”