SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jamie153 who wrote (480529)10/2/2021 2:21:55 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541274
 
>>who thinks of experiments like this?

I think of all sorts of things that I wouldn't bother to test. I found there was more motivation than a simple Frankenstein moment. Perhaps in your summary the actual intent was lost?
wired.com

I did a google search and found this ... and there was a legitimate research goal with the aim of curing diseases of depression and Parkinson's disease where specific areas of the brain need stimulation - kind of inspiring once we get past the grotesque pond-scum inoculated mouse aspects:

Deisseroth immediately put his lab to work figuring out what part of the brain needed to be stimulated to cure Parkinson's. Optogenetics was the ideal tool because it let researchers test various types of neurons to find which one would make legs move again, hands grasp again, faces smile again.But test after test failed. "This was a discouraging time," Deisseroth says. "The project was almost abandoned, because we had difficulty showing any therapeutic result."Many experts had thought the cure was to stimulate certain kinds of cells within the subthalamic nucleus, which coordinates motion. But when they tried that, it had no effect whatsoever. Then two of Deisseroth's grad students began experimenting with a dark-horse idea. They stimulated neurons near the surface of the brain that send signals into the subthalamic nucleus — a much harder approach because it meant working at one remove. It was as if, instead of using scissors yourself, you had to guide someone else's hands to make the cuts.Their idea worked. The mice walked. In their paper, published in April 2009, they wrote that the "effects were not subtle; indeed, in nearly every case these severely parkinsonian animals were restored to behavior indistinguishable from normal."Over at MIT, Boyden was asking the obvious question: Would this work on people? But imagine saying to a patient, "We're going to genetically alter your brain by injecting it with viruses that carry genes taken from pond scum, and then we're going to insert light sources into your skull." He was going to need some persuasive safety data first.