Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonyt who wrote (14298)	2/5/1998 5:14:00 PM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Respond to of 32384

tonyt, In your post#14289, you stated " I asked you to show where his analysis is incorrect. .....still waiting." The "his" referred to WTDEC. I then posted that you had never asked me that question. Now, you currently post a link which purports to show that you asked me that question last night. But, the link you posted does not show that you asked me that question. Rather, the link shows you asked me a different question in your post #14253. The question you asked in your post #14253 was,"What part of WTDEC's analysis do you disagree with?" Moreover, I answered that very question in my post #14254,"tonyt, Now you know I didn't indicate that I disagreed with WTDEC's analysis of what LGNDW was worth. Kindly indicate where I did so." So, once again we had a situation where I asked you last night for a reference to back up your question & instead of an answer, I receive a false accusation concerning a completely different statement of mine. It doesn't take a genius to realise that "What part of WTDEC's analysis do you disagree with?", is a different issue than showing "where his analysis is incorrect". So, once again your accuracy, if not your veracity is open to question. Meanwhile you have carefully dodged question after question. Was "Slick Willy" you law school professor? Bernie.