Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (8585)	2/5/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: Robert	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

Marcos, I posted on the PFG thread because the Silver content (accounting for fully owned vs partially owned properties) of both companies is similar. On the other hand, the valuation of MFL should include an extra 1.2M oz of gold. You are right about the promotion aspects of MFL and PFG. PFG has CMS, whose completely unjustified claim to fame is Arequipa. She didn't do as well as she should have on Arequipa, which had a property to die for with it's large gold content and dirt cheap production costs.......Robert