SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (214269)10/9/2021 6:25:27 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Respond to of 355699
 
I would never say there was an insurrection because the definition of insurrection has not been met.
Would love to hear your definition.......nay.....I insist on hearing your definition..

in·sur·rec·tion

/?ins?'rekSH(?)n/

noun

1.a violent uprising against an authority or government:"the insurrection was savagely put down"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries



www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › insurrectionInsurrection | Definition of Insurrection by Merriam-Webster

in· sur· rec· tion | \ ?in (t)-s?-'rek-sh?n. How to pronounce insurrection (audio) \. Essential Meaning of insurrection. : a usually violent attempt to take control of a government He led an armed insurrection [=rebellion, uprising] against the elected government. acts of insurrection.



legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com › insurrectionInsurrection legal definition of Insurrection

INSURRECTION. A rebellion of citizens or subjects of a country against its government. 2. The Constitution of the United States, art. 1, s. 8. gives power to congress " to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions." 3.



www.dictionary.com › browse › insurrectionInsurrection Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com

Insurrection definition, an act or instance of rising in revolt, rebellion, or resistance against civil authority or an established government. See more.



definitions.uslegal.com › i › insurrectionInsurrection Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from riots




To: i-node who wrote (214269)10/9/2021 6:45:35 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 355699
 
There is not effectively a SSOT (Single Source of Truth) on many topics

I didn't say anything about truth. I said facts. He said facts. If something has not been demonstrated to be true, then it is not a fact, but, rather, an assertion or an opinion.

he mentioned that people are committed to "sit on" various Wikipedia pages and "fix them"

If you had a Wiki entry, you'd be sitting on it, too. Or pay someone to do it for you.

Wiki clearly has some rough edges wrt curation. They need to work them out. I imagine that takes time and experience.

typical visitors are probably seeking alternate perspectives

He thinks so. I'm not so sure. That's not how I use it. I use it to look up something unfamiliar for a quick, reliable take. Either that or to find out what the official or establishment take is. I rarely get past the first paragraph. If I want to get into something more, I use it as a starting place for a search, not a final destination. Seems to me that there are multiple audiences for it and he wants your business, not mine. But there's a market for what it is. I send them money each year.

I'm sorry he's disappointed. I would be, too, if my baby got out of my control and took a different direction. But stuff evolves as markets develop. That's how things work. I thought it was a good interview, too.



To: i-node who wrote (214269)10/9/2021 6:45:50 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 355699
 
15 year old boy dies of cardiomyopathy 4 days after Pfizer vaccine shot. He already had Covid, so obviously he didn't need the vaccine, but Fauci and the Dems don't believe in science.

No point in trying to shame them for killing this kid since they have no conscience.

Tom



To: i-node who wrote (214269)10/9/2021 6:50:11 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 355699
 
There is not effectively a SSOT (Single Source of Truth) on many topics

I didn't say anything about truth. I said facts. He said facts. If something has not been demonstrated to be true, then it is not a fact, but, rather, an assertion or an opinion.

he mentioned that people are committed to "sit on" various Wikipedia pages and "fix them"

If you had a Wiki entry, you'd be sitting on it, too. Or pay someone to do it for you.

Wiki clearly has some rough edges wrt curation. They need to work them out. I imagine that takes time and experience.

typical visitors are probably seeking alternate perspectives

He thinks so. I'm not so sure. That's not how I use it. I use it to look up something unfamiliar for a quick, reliable take. Either that or to find out what the official or establishment take is. I rarely get past the first paragraph. If I want to get into something further, I use it as a starting place for a search, not a final destination. The footnotes are helpful. Seems to me that there are multiple audiences for it and he wants your business, not mine. But there's a market for what it is. I send them money each year.

I'm sorry he's disappointed. I would be, too, if my baby got out of my control and took a different direction. But stuff evolves as markets develop. Lots of inventors are disappointed. That's how things work. I thought it was a good interview, too.

Edit: Re insurrection and the like, if you have a venue that centers on the establishment, you will often be at odds because the establishment wrt ideas will always be the intellectuals, the educated, cosmopolitan crowd, the Episcopalians, not the anti-intellectual, anti-science Trumpy crowd. So you guys will always end up with the short end of the stick in that regard. Not the same as political bias although I'm sure it looks that way to you.